search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
23


sensitivity, peak shape, baseline artefact and retention perspective, none of the alternative high pH mobile phases tested offered better properties to ammonium hydroxide for MS friendly SIM development work.


Conclusions Excellent correlation of analyte retention when transferring from organic mobile phase additives to phosphate buffers at low and mid- pH was observed. In most cases absolute elution order and resolution was maintained while significantly increased UV sensitivity and decreased baseline slope were observed with phosphate buffers.


Data from this comparison suggests that many SIMs (or other methods) could be developed from an MS compatible method and transferred directly to an appropriate phosphate method for increased UV sensitivity and method robustness. Alternatively, a phosphate method could be directly transferred to an MS friendly alternative for identification of unknowns with a high degree of confidence.


In the few cases where a change in selectivity is observed and resolution decreases dramatically, it is suggested that experimental modelling is investigated (e.g.utilising Drylab or ACDLabs LC Simulator) to re-optimise the separation. This may involve varying gradient slope or


temperature or a combination of both to achieve the separation.


In the high pH mobile phase investigation, no alternative additive provided similar properties to the ammonium hydroxide generic method. Low retention correlation, increased baseline artefacts, poorer peak shapes and lower analyte sensitivity were typically observed with the majority of the alternative mobile phases. Alternative approaches to clean ammonium hydroxide mobile phases in order to decrease the artefact level are therefore required e.g. through use of appropriate mobile phase filters.


Acknowledgements


The authors would like to thank Adrian Davis (Research Analytics, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Sandwich) for useful discussions regarding ionic strength determination.


References


1. Van Gyseghem E., Van Hemelryck S., Daszykowski M., Questier F., Massart D. L., Vander Heyden Y. J. Chromatogr A (2003), 988, 77.


2. Van Gyseghem, E., Deconinck, E., Dumarey, M., Jimidar, M., Sneyers, R., Redlich, D., Verhoeven, E., Peys, W., De Smet, M., Vander Heyden, Y. J. Chromatogr. Sci. (2008), 46, 793.


3. Van Gyseghem, E.; Jimidar, M.; Sneyers, R.; Redlich, D.; Verhoeven, E.; Massart, D. L.; Vander Heyden, Y J. Chromatogr. A (2004), 1042, 69.


4. Xiao K.P ., Xiong Y., Liu F.Z., Rustum A.M. J. Chromatogr. A, (2007), 1163, 145.


5. Jupille T. H., Dolan J. W., Snyder L. R., Molnar I. J. Chromatogr. A (2002), 948, 35.


6. I. Molnár I., Rieger H.-J., Monks K.E. J. Chromatogr. A (2010), 1217, 3193.


7. Hewitt E.F., Lukulay P (2006), 1107, 79.


., Galushko S. J. Chromatogr. A


8. McBrien M. Chromatography Today May/June (2010), 30.


9. Apollonio L.G., Pianca D.J., Whittall I.R., Maher W.A., Kyd J.M. J. Chromatogr. B (2006), 836, 111.


10. Guo M.X., Wrisley L., Maygoo E Anal. Chim. Acta (2006), 571, 12.


11. Shao Y., Alluri R., Mummert M., Koetter U., Lech S. J. Pharm. & Biomed. Anal. (2004), 35, 625.


12. Mohammadi A., Rezanour N., Ansari Dogaheh M., Ghorbani Bidkorbeh F., Hashem M., Walker R.B. J. Chromatogr. B (2007), 846, 215.


13. Grosa G., Del Grosso E., Russo R., Allegrone G., J. Pharm. & Biomed. Anal. (2006), 41, 798.


14. Claessens H. A., van Straten M. A., Kirkland J.J. J. Chromatogr. A (1996) 728, 259.


15. Neue, U.D; Phoebe, C.H.; Tran, K.; Cheng, Y-F.; Lu, Z. J. Chromatogr. A (2001), 925, 49.


16. Li Y, Terfloth G.J., Kord A.S. American Pharmaceutical Review Apr May (2009), 87.


17. Gritti F, Guiochon G., J. Chromatogr. A (2004), 1033, 43.


18. Gritti F, Guiochon G., J. Chromatogr. A (2009), 1216, 3175.


19. Kirkland J. J., Henderson J. W., DeStefano J. J., van Straten M. A., Claessens H. A. J. Chromatogr. A (1997), 762, 97.


20. Slonecker P .J., Li X.D., Ridgeway T.H., Dorsey J.G. Anal. Chem. (1996), 68, 682.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52