search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Measuring and Managing Electron Dose


Figure 3: User interface of the AXON Dose Image Analysis tool, shown here with a zeolite sample. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the image with a radial line scan across the FFT is shown in the upper right of the figure. These tools, combined with cumulative dose and dose rate information, allow investigators to quantify changes in the intensity of the Bragg spots (“spot fading”) as an indicator of beam damage to the sample.


Operation An example of beam interactions producing visible changes


in a material is easily observed in liquid cell STEM. In situ studies have shown that rastering the electron beam through aqueous solutions causes radiolytic decomposition of water into reducing and oxidizing species, and aqueous electrons can drive the nucleation and growth of metallic nanoparticles. Te onset of nucleation, the particle growth rate, and other char- acteristics of the process are known to be dose- and dose rate- dependent. With AXON Dose, the impact of the electron beam on nanoparticle growth can be quantified.


Figures 4 and 5 show STEM images of HAuCl3 solution


imaged in a Poseidon liquid cell using AXON Dose. An area of the liquid cell was imaged at high magnification until a reac- tion was observed, and then the magnification was gradually reduced in steps. Tis created an image with high dose areas in the center surrounded by lower dose areas in the periph- ery. AXON Dose heatmaps allow these areas to be visualized as heatmaps, and the precise dose history for each pixel on each image is known. It is clear from the images that a correla- tion exists between cumulative dose and particle size and that higher electron dose produces larger particles.


Figure 4: A STEM image with a “heatmap” overlay showing the cumulative dose across a sample area. The HAuCl3 size (top right), whereas the low dose area (bottom right) has finer particles.


24


area exposed to high dose has a large particle www.microscopy-today.com • 2022 July


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72