search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Technology and Music Education for the Deaf - A Retired Teacher Looks Back


Maureen Butler NJMEA Special Learners Chair maureenbutlermusic@gmail.com


At the time I’m writing this, a new school year is half-


way over, and for the first time in 25 years I have not been actively teaching. I retired in June of 2020, and as I look back, I think about how much has changed in those years in the fields of technology, education, and hearing loss. As it has improved so many areas of our lives, tech- nology has transformed vital communication for the deaf and hard of hearing population - access to sound through improved hearing aids and cochlear implants, access to media through subtitles and captions, and improved ac- cess to family and friends and the world at large through the internet and video and text. That’s before we even needed to consider virtual learning as a viable format for instruction in our schools. Technology (regrettably, not available for all yet) has helped us continue to provide music education during a time of global pandemic. Today, you may have deaf or hard of hearing students


in your music classes who have benefited from this tech- nological growth. Indeed, twenty-five years ago, many of them would not have been included in your music class because of the limitations of technology. When I first began teaching at the Lake Drive School for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Mountain Lakes in 1995, our large student body came from all over northern New Jersey.


Students and staff utilized sign language, most


students wore analog hearing aids, and a mere handful wore cochlear implants. Today, many families choose to send their children, aided by cochlear implants or digi- tal hearing aids, to their own school districts. Much has changed in the span of twenty-five years, including an in- creased focus on an auditory/oral approach that capital- izes on improved access to sound. Let’s take a look at the some of these improvements and see how we can better include students with hearing loss in our music classes in hybrid, virtual, or in-person settings.


TEMPO 32


Hearing aids and cochlear implants The newest digital hearing aids have come a long


way from analog hearing aids that amplified all sounds equally. The latest models use directional microphones to recognize the location of the primary signal, as well as timing differences to distinguish primary sound from background noise. Additionally, better technology ana- lyzes sound to determine which sounds to filter out. In my work with hearing-aid users, I’ve noticed significant difference in what they are now able to hear, distinguish, and appreciate in the music room. For example, students seem to be better able to perceive differences in pitch and in melodic direction, although much depends on the se- verity of the hearing loss and other factors that may im- pact their perception and interpretation of sound. Get- ting to know your students with hearing loss will help you understand what skills are available to them, and how to modify your expectations of their abilities. The development of the cochlear implant has had a huge impact on deaf education. These devices consist of internal and external components, and, like hearing aids, have become increasingly smaller and sophisticated. You may have noticed some of your students wearing a speech processor behind or above the ear, which receives sound and converts it to FM radio signals. These signals are transmitted to the implant embedded under the skin, and then travel to an electrode array that has been inserted in the cochlea. The auditory nerve fibers are stimulated and send the sound information to the brain. Results are seen after dedicated time and practice, as the brain begins to make sense of the auditory input it receives. In 1995, the criteria for children to have this surgical procedure was quite restrictive and precluded the availability of it for most children. Today a large percentage of children with


MAY 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64