AAC


The history and administration of Arkansas property taxes


money.” But Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., an early 20th-cen- tury Supreme Court jurist, said what most any level-headed person would think and say, “Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.”


A History Surveys find that the “property tax” is the most hated of all


taxes. Why is it, detractors say, that you have to keep paying the government on something that you own — forever? Or, in the words of one protester on YouTube, property tax is “oxymoronic, unjust, and un-American!” On that last point, he’s onto something, at least on a literal


level: Te origins of the property tax aren’t American at all. It, instead, has roots that date back to Europe’s feudal system. First instituted in England by William the Conqueror in 1066, the early tax system worked this way: A king (or con- queror) took over all the land in a given territory. He would then divide it among his lieutenants and supporters, who would pay him (with money or services) in order to keep that land. In return, landholders enjoyed the king’s protection and were able to rent the property out to others who would live and work the land for a fee. Te punishment for nonpayment was forfeiture of the land. At the time, this system was called “free and common socage.” Te person who held the land was called a socman, his taxes — socage. Te arrangement created a way for people to own land while still having to remain loyal to the crown, which also had rights to the land. After expansion across the Atlantic started, King James made sure that this system traveled overseas with the first settlers at Jamestown, so he could partake in the profits of ex- ploration of the new land. Te charter of the Virginia Com- pany held that, as in feudal times, the king would protect the lands in Jamestown, and in return, the people living on the land would pay him a share of their profits. When the colonists revolted and property owners no longer had a king to answer to, the new American govern- ment had to figure out who actually owned the land. It was decided that the government would step into the role the king once held. Te Northwest Ordinance established that the federal government owned all the lands, and the state served as the “donor,” which essentially meant the person who collected the fees from the tenants. After the North- west Ordinance, when land was sold to an individual, the state had the right to collect payment from that individual


COUNTY LINES, WINTER 2020


rthur Godfrey, the American radio and television broadcaster and entertainer, once said something like this, “I’m proud to be paying taxes. Te only thing is — I could be just as proud for half the


in perpetuity. Tis was a system very similar to free and common socage called “fee simple.” Tat basic prin- ciple, and terminology, persists today: Anyone buying a house will notice the term “fee simple” in their legal docu- ments stating that they own the land and property, which is still subject to taxes. It’s a peculiar note of history that the founding fathers, who spoke often of abolishing the feudal system, kept this rem- nant of the Old World. But the rationale is very simple: Tey needed the money. In fact, the federal government levied a national property tax in 1798, 1814, 1815, 1816, and 1861. Tese taxes usually outraged residents, who would often revolt, but the system of collecting property tax remained. Tat’s because property taxes were locally collected and spent, and often paid for things like roads that property owners would be able to see, and that increased the value of their property. Sound familiar? Property taxes in the United States, as we know them, originated during colonial times after the American Revolu- tionary War. By 1796, state and local governments in 14 of the 15 states taxed land. Delaware did not tax property, but rather the income from it. Arkansas, of course, did not exist as a state yet. During the period from 1796 until the Civil War, a unify- ing principle developed: “the taxation of all property, mov- able and immovable, visible and invisible, or real and per- sonal at one uniform rate.” During this period, property taxes came to be assessed based on value. Tis was introduced as a requirement in many state constitutions such as the Arkansas Constitution of 1874. After the Civil War, intangible property, including corpo- rate stock, took on far greater importance. Taxing jurisdic- tions found it difficult to find and tax this sort of property. Tis trend led to the introduction of alternatives to the property tax, such as income and sales taxes, at the state level. Property taxes remained a major source of government revenue below the state level. Various economic factors have led to taxpayer initiatives in


various states to limit property tax. In 1978 Proposition 13 amended the California Constitution to limit aggregate prop- erty taxes to 1 percent of the “full cash value of property.” It also limited the increase in assessed value of real property to an inflation factor that was limited to 2 percent per year.


See “TAXES” on Page 18 >>> 17


Eddie A. Jones County Consultant


SEEMS TO ME ...


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48