search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INDUSTRY NEWS


ClassNK Completes Joint Feasibility Study on 3D Model Based Approval With JMU and NAPA


Leading Classification Society ClassNK, Japan Marine United (JMU), and NAPA have completed a joint feasibility study on 3D model based plan approval using 3D CAD models as part of their technical investigation project.


Shipbuilding designs are gradually transitioning from 2D drawings to those designed with 3D CAD software. Classification societies, whose plan approvals are currently based mostly on 2D drawings, are also required to develop a scheme for 3D CAD models from their submission to their examination completion.


This project was conducted to examine the technical development required


in each process of plan approval by JMU, NAPA, and ClassNK to realize 3D model based plan approval. In the feasibility study, ClassNK conducted a trial evaluation for hull structural design on a 3D CAD model of 300,000DWT ore carrier designed and created by JMU, using “NAPA Designer”, a 3D CAD software application for ship design developed by NAPA, as a 3D model viewer. Plan submission, storage, and notification of examination results were made using the Society’s electronic plan examination system “NK-PASS”.


The investigation concluded that information required for class approval can be confirmed through a 3D CAD model, and that “NK-PASS” is also compatible with 3D CAD models. The results of this survey will serve as a


basis for future technical studies, and the Society will continue to work with the industry to realize 3D model based plan approval.


Speaking on the occasion, Mr. Hayato Suga, Corporate Officer and Director of Plan Approval and Technical Solution Division said “This study has proven the future potential of 3D model based approvals. 3D based design can be the key to improving digital solutions in the ship industry, including the ship design process, approval process and later fleet maintenance. I hope that the entire industry will also quickly realize the many opportunities and increased efficiency that can be achieved as a result of this initiative. The vessels of the future will be able to accommodate much better and safer designs in shorter amounts of time.”


Xpediator Signs 20 Year Lease With


Associated British Ports Xpediator has signed a 20 year lease with Associated British Ports for a new 200,000 sq ft distribution centre at Southampton's Container Port.


The AIM-listed provider of freight management services said the opening of the new facility will take its UK warehousing capability to around 700,000 sq ft.


Associated British Ports has already kick-started the development of the new distribution centre which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2021.


The new warehouse site is designed to connect with Import Services’ existing quayside distribution centre, doubling Import Services’ operational capacity.


Shares in Xpediator were trading 2.00% higher at 25.5p during Wednesday 25th trading.


The combined facilities will enable Import Services to hold stock under bond for order processing and distribution across the UK, continental Europe and global markets, this morning's statement highlighted.


12 www.dockyard-mag.com April 2020


“Import Services’ new distribution centre will be just 100 meters away from where the deep sea container ships dock and with this new facility, our teams will be able to discharge containers efficiently, process orders and deliver straight to the point of demand,” said Stephen Blyth, CEO of Xpediator.


He added, “This new facility will not only enable us to meet demand but also capture additional market share by being able to offer superior services.


The timing of this expansion could also work favourably with the UK’s move outside of the European Union.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48