The UK leads the world in the range and scale of implementations of CLT technology

So the arrival of these methods of timber construction is timely. A number of innovative architects, engineers, developers and contractors in this country have pioneered the use of CLT as an alternative to concrete and steel in more, and larger buildings. As a result of this, the UK leads the world in the range and scale of implementations of this technology with around 600 completed CLT structures. However, in the aftermath of the tragedy at Grenfell Tower in 2017, the UK Government introduced legislation that threatens to damage the perception of timber as a construction material and could have a significant impact on the industry. As a result of the ban on combustible materials in the external walls of residential buildings taller than 18 metres, there is an erroneous perception that CLT may be a fire risk. This is completely untrue. It is important to understand how engineered timber performs in combustion, as it actually has a number of benefits that offer an improved performance in the event of a fire in comparison to other building technologies. In the first instance, in a CLT building there is no increase in the likelihood of a fire starting. The majority of fires ignite through electrical faults and accidents, such as cigarettes left on furniture. If a fire starts in a CLT building, the burning causes the formation of a char layer on large timber elements which actually protects the timber beneath and inhibits further deterioration. Once a fire starts, the key issue is that it should be contained. Most catastrophic fires occur because a fire has spread dramatically from the source of ignition. In a CLT building, with walls and floors made from solid timber, the fire is unlikely to break out of the compartment in which it starts, even if the fire fighters take a long time to attend. When we design in CLT we often protect the CLT with plasterboard, and, where we rely on the charring for fire protection, we increase the size of structural members to account for the loss of the charred layer.

In many framed forms of construction, a 30-minute firewall will be exactly that, and after half an hour the fire will breach that wall, spreading to adjacent spaces. In a CLT


Dalston Lane © Daniel Shearing

wall, it will continue to act as a barrier to the fire well beyond the fire rating. The fact is that all materials can be adversely affected by fire – steel melts and concrete spalls (explodes). The key is that designers understand the material’s performance and design accordingly. We are convinced that when designed properly, CLT structures are at least as safe as other forms of construction.

The challenge we now face is to provide the testing data and other material required to ensure that buyers, funders, underwriters and politicians understand this as well as the professionals who use CLT so that we can rely on regulations that are based on evidence.

Across the world, countries are amending their building regulations to support taller engineered timber structures, supported by extensive testing. In the next decade, the UK’s lead in this ground breaking technology is likely to be eclipsed as the rest

of the world adopts the techniques that were initiated here. More than this, however is our responsibility to the environment – by

creating a long term store for CO2 absorbed during a tree’s growth and substituting high polluting materials like concrete and steel, CLT can be a key agent in the drive to reduce global atmospheric carbon, but there is another factor. If we create a large, sustainable market for timber, the widespread adoption of CLT can drive the reforestation needed – over the last two centuries, every country that has increased its timber manufacturing capacity has increased its forest cover by a commensurate amount. By moving to CLT we can better ensure large scale tree planting than by Government urging, and grants.

Anthony Thistleton is director and co-founder of Waugh Thistleton Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84