search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


Rubber crumb leaches environmental toxins


Chicken embryo model allows researchers to assess toxicity of environmental pollutants


New research, spearheaded by scientists at McGill University, reports on exposing chicken embryos - a model of higher vertebrate development - to leachate from rubber crumb used, for example, in artificial turf infill, to assess the toxicity of environmental pollutants contained in such material.


The new study, published in the journal PNAS, by a team of scientists from McGill’s Department of Chemical Engineering and Redpath Museum and Health Canada, is the first to use chicken eggs as a comprehensive model system for testing environmental toxins.


Nathalie Tufenkji, co-senior author of the new study and a professor in McGill’s Department of Chemical Engineering, said the use of a “higher vertebrate” testing model has the advantage of being able to measure system-wide effects of environmental toxins, something for which previous models used to test the toxicity of crumb rubber - such as algae, water fleas, zebra fish and mammalian cell cultures- fell short.


“We were curious to understand what impact the rubber crumb might have on the environment and wildlife in general,” Tufenkji said. “Precipitation on outdoor fields containing rubber crumb might lead to leaching of chemicals into the environment, and how those chemicals may interact with vertebrate development and health are unknown.”


This multi-disciplinary effort demonstrated that the early development of chicken embryos is compromised when eggs are exposed to small amounts of water in which rubber crumbs soaked for seven days. When directly injected into the egg yolks, this leachate caused mild to severe malformations, including impaired development of the brain and the cardiovascular system.


Hans Larsson, a professor at McGill’s Redpath Museum, says that their new chicken embryo model will provide useful information about how toxins disrupt embryo development of such a complex animal.


“Chicken eggs are, relatively speaking, closely related to mammals, including humans,” said Larsson, the study’s other co-senior investigator. “Their genome, anatomy and development are closer to ours than the other standard models, so using them as a test system for environmental toxins may be the most efficient way to explore how these toxins might potentially affect human health.”


Tufenkji and Larsson’s teams now plan to further assess what kind of chemicals are released from rubber crumb under natural conditions in different environmental scenarios.


“We would like to test leachate from naturally weathered rubber crumb and track its potential effects on chicken embryo development,” said Tufenkji.


This work received financial support from the Canada Research Chairs program, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (Integrated Quantitative Biology Initiative).


Jim Nedin wins 2019 Edwin Budding Award


Jim Nedin, a consultant for Turf Industry Service Business Optimization in York, Pa., is the winner of the 2019 Edwin Budding Award from GCSAA.


The Edwin Budding Award, named for the inventor of the lawn mower, is given annually to an equipment manager or related innovator, technician, educator or engineer who has made a significant impact in the golf and turf business.


Nedin has been involved in the turf industry for more than forty years. He began his career as a golf course superintendent in the early 1970s and has taught turf industry- related seminars for more than thirty years. Nedin has provided technical support for a multitude of state, regional, national and international golf tournaments.


Ross MacFarlane, a greenkeeper at The Carrick, managed to snap the cheeky deer with its tongue out on a visit earlier this year, and entered it in a competition ran by the Kingshouse Hotel - with more than 3,000 people picking Ross's work as their favourite from hundreds of entries.


And its popularity has come as a surprise to Ross - who didn't realise at the time how special the shot was.


He told the Lennox Herald: “I just took it on my iPhone, so I reckon it was just a lucky shot if I’m being honest.”


“It wasn’t until I got home that I noticed and thought that it wasn’t a bad shot.”


“We go to Glencoe every February because that's where me and my fiance, Dorothy, got engaged, and that’s where we got it.”


6 PC December/January 2020


“Working in the turf industry has been much more than a job to me. It has been my life’s work and passion,” says Nedin. “There’s a picture of me standing behind my father’s reel-type power lawn mower when I was just 5 years old. At age 9, I worked in a lawn mower repair shop, and in my teens, I started working at a local country club, repairing golf carts and turf equipment. Eventually, I was promoted to assistant superintendent, then superintendent.”


“Being the recipient of this year’s prestigious Edwin Budding award is truly an honour,” says Nedin. “There are so many great people in this industry I’ve had the privilege of working with over the years. We get up every morning, go to work, and simply do our jobs. I am


humbled and greatly appreciative to those who nominated me.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148