downsmail.co.uk
process are filtered out, measured and overseen by the Environment Agency. The flies he refers to have been shown to
come from farmland spread with manure. There is a residents’ liaison commi�ee
which meets regularly, and Mr Brooks could apply to join it so that he can see the strong procedures which are the modus operandi of the plant. There are also tours for those who want
to see what happens inside the plant. I do hope he will take advantage of one
or other of these opportunities and thus change his outlook on this difficult but essential part of life. Dan Daley, KCC, member for Maidstone Central
Planning criticism unfair
I AND other members of the planning commi�ee on Maidstone Borough Council do not object to criticism of our decisions, when it is factually based. However, your correspondent Peter
Mitchell should have checked a few facts. Firstly, the Ombudsman does not overturn planning decisions at appeal, this is done by to the Planning Inspectorate. Secondly, he seems to be under the
impression that there is a right of appeal against the granting of planning permission, when no such right exists. Beyond that, I am at a loss as to the
nature of his argument. On the one hand, he accuses us of
approving too many applications against Government guidance, particularly in relation to garden developments, and on the other, he celebrates the fact that the council has lost appeals when upholding Government and local policies, sometimes on the exact type of sites he says we should be protecting. The planning commi�ee does not
disregard planning policies and guidelines and our concern over some recent inspector’s decisions was precisely because inspectors had overturned refusals that seemed in line with Local Plan and Government policies. These refusals were also supported by
parish councils and residents. I would have thought he should share
our concern at the inconsistency of the Planning Inspectorate in upholding the Government’s policies, but clearly that is not the case. Cllr Clive English, Chairman Planning Commiee, MBC
Labour not backing women
I ADMIRE K G Banks’ audacity when he claims that “the Labour Party has done more than the others to encourage women to pursue political careers and, providing the right candidate emerges, a new Shirley Williams say, or a Barbara Castle, it can only be a ma�er of time before a woman takes full control”. Try telling that to Luciana Berger or
Margaret Hodge, both of whom are being driven out of Labour because they are Jewish. Mike Ka�, the national chair of the
Jewish Labour Movement said “Margaret Hodge has been a steadfast campaigner against racism, fascism and intolerance throughout her political life”. She saw off the BNP in Barking, but is
now being de-selected by Momentum for complaining about anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. Luciana Berger had to take a bodyguard
to the previous Labour party conference and, according to The Times of Israel, she “resigned from Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party in the face of Jew-hate”. Chris Leslie and Chuka Umunna
resigned saying that they couldn’t remain in a party that they now regard as racist and anti-Semitic. K G Banks had to scrape the bo�om of
the barrel to find examples of women faring well in the Labour Party, but again, he becomes unstuck. Most readers will be too young to have
heard of Barbara Castle, who left parliament 40 years ago. I read online in the Guardian’s obituary
for her that Labour women had to insist that one woman candidate be chosen to join the three men selected to contest the Blackburn seat!
The other example of Shirley Williams
is also classic spin. She resigned from the Labour Party in 1981 with four others due to the influence of the extreme left. Most people realise that the Labour
Party of their youth has become a racist, bigoted party and its MPs free-loaders who’ll turn a blind eye to any intolerance or racism just to keep their big salaries and expense accounts. Mike Wardle, Walderslade.
Fast food plan a health risk
IAM writing on behalf of the Snodland residents who are opposed to the fast food development planned at the bo�om of Hollow Lane in Snodland. We have expressed our main concern
regarding public health. Linked to obesity, diabetes, cancer, the
fried food offered in these restaurants contributes to a deadly amount of salt and saturated fats in our diet. We should be particularly concerned
that our youth is going to be more exposed to unhealthy eating. Surely this new development is not
going to help central Government’s targets of lowering obesity amongst the young? With eight takeaways in Snodland, a
McDonalds planned on the A228 opposite the M&S garage, and now the new KFC development planned at the bo�om of the town, this community is being targeted by the fast food industry, the residents being obviously easy prey and falling in the category of population inclined to go to fast food restaurants. More particularly, we feel that KFC is
unethical: with an estimated 850 million chickens slaughtered every year, KFC has donated much funding to charity in a pledge to help fight cancer. Instead of plaguing the residents of
Snodland with yet more fast food, Snodland Council and Tonbridge and Malling Council should have the courage to say NO to a development which presents no real benefits and certain negative outcomes. Annick West, Malling Road, Snodland
The five editions of the Downs Mail are delivered to 90% of households in the Maidstone and Malling area, reaching over 190, 000 readers every month.
Maidstone North
Contact our teams…. Editorial Editor: Simon Finlay
Simon.finlay@
downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735
Deputy editor: Doug Kempster
doug.kempster@
downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735
Maidstone South Maidstone East Maidstone Weald
Current and archived editions are also free to read online at
www.downsmail.co.uk
Sales
Sales Manager: Bill Brett
Bill.brett@
downsmail.co.uk 01622 630330 ext. 221 Advertising Sales Enquiry: 01622 630330 option 1
Accounts Dept.
accounts@downsmail.co.uk 01622 630330 ext 229
Mail Publications Ltd Forge House
Bearsted Green Business Park Bearsted, Maidstone ME14 4DT
Maidstone November 2019 47 Malling
Comment
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48