search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
[RIGGER’S CORNER]


KEEPING IT SAFE AND EFFICIENT WHEN WORKING IN WIND


Denis Hogan, Performance and Special Projects Manager at the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association (LEEA), highlights the regulations for working safely and efficiently with lifting equipment in the European wind energy sector.


As the wind energy sector expands, so too does its requirement for lifting equipment, for which this relatively new industry sets several challenges. Working with lifting equipment must be carried out with safety as the priority because working at height in any application exposes people to risk. But working in the wind energy sector also often adds harsh environments into the equation. Tis compounds the costs of maintenance in a sector where uptime is already a priority in order to maintain energy generation. So downtime must be minimised to enhance safety and efficiency. Tere are two key pieces of legislation that applies to all lifting equipment and accessories that may be used in the wind energy sector in Europe. Te Machinery Directive polices the market in the first instance then, when the equipment is in service, the Work Equipment Directive applies to servicing, maintenance, repair and thorough examination inspection. Given that the lifting equipment is fit for the intended purpose, having a regular maintenance programme is crucial because of the environment in which it operates – even onshore the equipment can be subjected to highly corrosive atmospheres. A regular programme of maintenance is not just to identify repairs but also to maintain equipment in good working order. In addition, the equipment needs to be thoroughly examined according to the appropriate regulations. As mentioned this is primarily the Work Equipment


Directive, but it is also important to follow the subtle difference of the regulations of the country in which the equipment is operated. For example, in the UK this means LOLER (Te Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment


Regulations 1998), and PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998). When designing


a programme for maintenance, it is vital that the risks and the conditions involved and the environment in which it operates are taken into consideration. Te programme for thorough examinations may need to be at a greater frequency than is required by the Work Equipment Directive, as is the case in UK. A greater frequency mitigates the risks involved and the greater likelihood of something going wrong. One of the best ways to minimise the risks around using and maintaining lifting equipment in the wind energy sector is to use a member of the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association. LEEA has many members throughout Europe who are active in the offshore renewable energy sector – whether as installers, duty holders, owners or persons engaged in thorough examination activities including service and maintenance. Tey will have been audited to ensure they provide a gold standard that assures operators in the wind sector an excellent service. y


Learn more about LEEA at www.leeaint.com/


80


MARCH–APRIL 2019


WIRE ROPE EXCHANGE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84