search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
34 FINANCE & INSURANCE


POTENTIAL BORROWERS ARE FORTUNATE IN THE FACT THAT THE LENDING MARKETPLACE IS NOW MORE DIVERSIFIED AND DYNAMIC THAN IT EVER HAS BEEN BEFORE


many and complicated. They essentially relate to claims from borrowers that the sums agreed were not released on time, and that insufficient notice was provided when calling in loans for repayment. It is reported that 5,000 investors are involved, who lent a combined £8.2m.


THE FCA’S INVOLVEMENT


The company in question has publicly stated that it has not asked for assistance from the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) and has only held a routine scheduled meeting with them, but some of the press coverage and critics have inter- preted the meeting differently. This isn’t the first time the FCA has become involved in the rapidly growing P2P marketplace.


Earlier in 2018, they published a report expressing concerns about aspects of the P2P lending environment, including some relating to investor protection. They specifically raised the issues that the P2P landscape is very complex, there can be a lack of communication, and the manage- ment of risk could be improved. It might well be the case that more direct and regulatory FCA involvement in the P2P domain is something to be anticipated in future.


ANALYSIS


P2P lending is an extremely important part of today’s UK construction funding environment. There is no suggestion that this should be otherwise, or that major problems are likely to become the norm. However, it seems equally clear that there remain certain concerns relating to the suitability of this mechanism for some types of borrowers, and equally importantly, whether the interests of investors are being adequately protected.


In situations where you might be seeking flexible borrowing in support of a construc- tion project, it’s highly advisable to do your research thoroughly in advance. That should not be simply a question of looking at a variety of P2P funding platforms, but considering alternative options, such as full joint venture funding.


In addition, consider the nature of the solution provider. One of the things that borrowers should be seeking is a profes- sional business-as-usual and trauma-free engagement with the provider of their funds. It’s therefore important to be certain that the funds provider is ‘running a tight ship.’


During these uncertain times, with Brexit on the horizon, it has never been more important for housebuilders to choose a funder for the long term, one who is invested in seeing a development project from its initial plans through to completion. Joint ventures certainly have this advantage.


SUMMARY


Potential borrowers are fortunate in the fact that the lending marketplace is now more diversified and dynamic than it has ever been before. However, that very diversity can bring with it risks and issues which have been highlighted in some of the events in the recent media reports. The bottom line is that housebuilders must look around at all the options rather than simply defaulting to the P2P environ- ment. Hunt out flexible, sustainable funding that fits you and your project. It does exist.


Jason Tebb is COO at Go Develop


Protek Structural Warranty


New Build Permitted Development Commercial I


Structural Warranty solutions that enable residential and commercial development


www.protekwarranty.co.uk I 0333 456 5040 WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK I


FREE Registration


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52