search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
until the individual successfully completes the return-to-duty process described in Part 40, Subpart O. Te date of the violation has no impact on this requirement. For example, an employer, interviewing an applicant in 2017 who had a positive DOT test in 2012, may assume since the positive test was five years ago, this individual can be hired without ensuring he or she completed the return-to- duty process. Tis assumption is false; the applicant must still be able to demonstrate successful completion of the return-to-duty requirements of Part 40.


Clarification: An Employee Who Consumes Alcohol While On-Call Has Not Violated An FTA Prohibition


Previously, the FTA reported that a previous employer must disclose


whether the employee has violated any of the prohibitions on the use of drugs or the misuse of alcohol under a DOT agency, which for the FTA, are specified in §655.21(c), and §655.32-§655.34. Since, the FTA has clarified that a covered employee who has consumed alcohol while on-call to perform a safety- sensitive function has not violated an FTA prohibition. Because §655.33 (b) includes provisions allowing for an on-call employee to acknowledge the use of alcohol at the time they are called to report for duty, this behavior would not be considered a violation of an FTA rule.


Firearm Discharge Is Not Cause for FTA Post-Accident Testing


Carrying a firearm for security purposes is one of the five safety-sensitive


functions defined in 49 CFR Part 655, and therefore those performing this function are subject to DOT/FTA drug and alcohol testing. However, there is no automatic DOT/FTA requirement for drug and alcohol testing following the discharge of a firearm by security personnel. Although the act could trigger a reasonable suspicion interview by a trained and authorized company official, since it does not fall under the FTA definition of an accident, the act itself may not result in DOT/FTA post- accident testing. For more information on these FTA


updates, visit htps://www.transit.dot.gov/ sites/ſta.dot.gov/files/docs/regulations- and-guidance/safety/69121/ſta-drug-and- alcohol-newsleter-issue-64.pdf. ❚


www.datia.org


datia focus


33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52