search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Industry news


in many ways. These include the complex, lengthy and sensitive process of helping residents to move to better homes, obtaining the necessary grant funding at a time of constrained public sector finances to avoid a partially completed project, tackling the many construction issues including using existing infrastructure on a sloping site and overcoming the many legal issues, such as identifying the owners of houses that had been left empty.


BACKGROUND Swilly was conceived as a ‘home for World War I heroes’ and building work started in 1921. As well as providing new homes, the development served to clear run-down areas of nearby Plymouth, Stonehouse and Devonport. During World War II the first bombs that fell on Plymouth fell in North Prospect. Other neighbourhoods in the city bore the brunt of the bombing and post war North Prospect became home to many families displaced by the destruction of large parts of the city. With its mostly three-bed, semi-detached homes, Swilly had all the outward


trappings of a garden suburb lifestyle to bring up a family. The homes had large rear gardens so tenants could grow their own vegetables for a healthy lifestyle, neatly presented front gardens bordered with picket fences or hedges, and a lime tree at the front of every house. There were wide pavements sufficient to allow for mums with prams to pass each other, and narrow roads with the only expected traffic being the occasional milk float, coal cart, motorbike and bicycle. In its heyday the estate of homes built for £400 each was also known by locals


as ‘Paradise at 12 shillings a week’ (about 60p today). From the 1960s onwards building faults and social problems caused it to


quickly gain the reputation as the ‘Cinderella’ housing estate in Plymouth and ranked as one of the most deprived communities in England. More recently building surveys highlighted structural cracking, wall tie


failure and extensive and untreatable damp. Residents complained that homes were difficult to live in and expensive to keep warm. Nearly 60 per cent of homes failed even the basic Decent Homes Standard.


PCH programme manager, James Savage, said that regeneration goes beyond providing new and better homes to improve family lifestyle, health, education and security


BEYOND BETTER HOMES In 2009, Plymouth City Council transferred its housing stock of 14,000 homes and 45,000 residents to PCH. As part of the agreement, PCH were required to deliver a major programme of improvements within five years with the regeneration of North Prospect identified as a high priority. PCH management set about providing new impetus to the already up and


running consultation with local residents about the future of North Prospect. The close ties it built with the local community proved to be the bedrock of PCH’s vision for a transformation of the estate as it began to return to its showcase status as a place where residents were choosing to live. The construction involved putting into reverse much of the original concept


of the estate. Space was taken back from the large gardens and wide pavements and used to widen the roads to allow for today’s car ownership. The density of the housing rose from 30 to 50 dwellings per hectare to increase the financial viability of the construction to provide quality affordable housing for rent, shared ownership or private ownership. The estate that started to emerge was an open environment with a greater


choice of house types – which were more energy efficient to reduce fuel bills, robust to need less repair and maintenance and more secure and safe. A community hub, known as The Beacon, was built in the centre of North


Prospect to provide a much needed focal point for the community. It included shops, a library, cafe and meeting places and apartments for the over 55s. North Prospect started to win architectural and building awards and even


received a Royal visit from Princess Anne in 2015. With many of the technical problems, rehousing issues and funding difficulties overcome, the regeneration at North Prospect is continuing and is due for completion in 2022 at a cost of £130 million. PCH programme manager, James Savage, said that regeneration goes beyond


providing new and better homes to improve family lifestyle, health, education and security. “A case study we did with the Homes and Communities Agency reported that because families now have properly insulated homes, children would not have to do their homework wrapped up in a duvet on their bed and could use the kitchen table instead. It’s so easy to get lost in all the statistics around new homes, but children are achieving at school and health rates are improving.” Paul Shepherd, designing out crime officer, who is embedded with Plymouth


City Council, explained that long before a spade had even touched the ground, there were pre-planning meetings every week for many months to discuss and debate all building considerations including how to ‘design out crime’. “It was fantastic to have this level of reassurance that the plans were being continually improved. This was important because it channelled all of us into working to ensure residents were going to be happy and safe in their new community,” he said.


28 | HMM January 2018 | www.housingmmonline.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52