search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
As well as the use of re-used composite in the form of strips, the use of shredded material also was investigated. Shredded composites yields flakes that are also oblong in shape (see photo below) and can therefore act as a reinforcement in the same way as strips. The advantage of shredding is that it is a more economical process than sawing the old composite into strips. On the other hand, as can be seen from Figure 2, the strength that can be achieved in a new products is on a lower level than with the use of strips.


Re-use for retaining walls in canals


There are a great number of canals in The Netherlands. The manifold canals originate from the fact that large parts of the land were reclaimed from the sea and canals were needed for transportation but also to remove drainage water. To maintain the integrity of the shore of a canal, generally a camp sheet is installed that acts as a retaining wall. Camp sheeting can be manufactured in different ways and using different materials, depending on the depth of the water at the shore side, the height of the soil-wall to be retained and the type of soil (sand, clay, peat). Camp sheeting is in permanent contact with water, both at the canal side and at the soil side. Therefore the materials must be long term water resistant. Both steel and tropical hard wood camp sheeting are degraded at the water surface within 20 years and have to be replaced. The photo right shows a degraded steel camp sheeting (Photo by/courtesy of BiinC).


Medium size camp sheeting is generally constructed as so-called sheet-piling: interlocking profiles of tropical hard wood which are vertically installed into the soil using a vibrating hammer block. Tropical hard wood profiles used for camp


Photo by/courtesy of BiinC


sheeting have a typical length of 3 to 6 metres of which the retaining height of the soil is typically one third of its length, the other part being forced into the ground. The profiles have a cross-section with a typical thickness of 40 to 60 mm and an effective width of 200 to 400 mm and are fitted with a tongue- and-groove detailing to interlock with the neighbouring profiles. Although tropical hard wood has a relatively high durability in wet conditions the life-time under these conditions is limited to 20 years maximum. Moreover, it is undesirable to use tropical hard wood because of the strain it puts on the rain forests. Therefore it was investigated whether these tropical hard wood profiles can be replaced by composite profiles made from re- used EoL thermoset composites.


It is the expectation that the new composite camp sheeting made with EoL thermoset composite will be extremely durable since the service life of composite products in wet conditions is reported to be 60 to 100 years [5]. Moreover, the new composite profiles can be engineered for a high mechanical strength, using the reinforcing elements of the EoL composite in combination with virgin material. Paradoxically, two drawbacks of the re-use of EoL composite principle work to the advantage in the design of these new camp sheeting. The first drawback is the relatively heavy weight of the new composite, the second is the limitation to flat designs like profiles and panels because of the relatively large and oblong elements.


The Report • September 2017 • Issue 81 | 55


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84