significant
improvement on comparative
tracking apparatus, which often require reverse logistics. Where connectivity is available, co-ordinators are able to monitor a device’s position in real-time via the COMACOD transmitter, allowing far more accurate transport
planning and resources. “Many
devices
function independently, without
maintenance or a battery recharge, for up to five years.” A start-up company, Track4C, was established in
technology in real world deployments. COMACOD,
organisation of containers
become lost whilst not in use – creating huge costs for freight companies. Often, they’re also only partially full,” says Moerman. “This wastage could be mitigated by precise tracking.” The system could also enhance security measures, potentially aiding
law
enforcement agencies by identifying where shipments are compromised. “Today, significant
time is lost at border control
posts, as documents need to be verified and containers individually checked,” says Moerman. “This process
which paperwork, abundant but could be speeded up
through automation. We’ve therefore developed an electronic lock or seal that, if breached, could be
with contraband
triggers an alarm. Such alerts shared
authorities – helping to prevent smuggling and the addition of
to
is an onerous, manual involves
the group’s current project,
seeks to refine the next crucial step in the process: the design of a middleware solution and ‘back-end’
service platform that
communicates with the users. This venture is
an academic/industrial partnership,
involving commercial enterprises such as Trimble Transport & Logistics and software developers Invenso. “We want to introduce a dynamic solution which can be easily reconfigured if a client wants more information about a shipment, or if container’s
a contents change,” explains
Hoebeke. “This will be provided in the form of a user-friendly ‘dashboard’, which allows updates to be processed remotely, so that they don’t interrupt the logistical chain. COAP (Constrained Application Protocol), a medium that
allows the relevant small, low-power
electronic devices to communicate via the internet, can achieve this. It’s a global, standardised solution, has the same benefits as HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) and is very easy to adapt.”
2012 to pilot the
AT A GLANCE Project Information
Project Title: COMACOD: Control and management of constrained devices
Project Objective: Tracking and monitoring systems are important in various industries in order to optimise process flows and deliver better service to customers. COMACOD’s goal is to develop enhancements that make tracking and monitoring systems more efficient, flexible, manageable, automated and reusable for different markets and applications with minimal effort.
Project Duration and Timing: 2 years, January 2013 to December 2014
Project Funding: iMinds ICON project. Total budget 1.700kEuro (730kEuro iMinds funding)
Project Partners: Research departments: iMinds - IBCN - UGent, Minds - WiCa - UGent, iMinds - Distrinet - KU Leuven Industrial partners: Multicap, oneAccess, Track4C, Trimble Transport & Logistics, Invenso
“Monitoring the status of shipping containers helps to ensure that extended supply chains are effectively managed, minimising wastage and curtailing loss” Showcasing its versatility,
shipments, looting and the unexplained ‘disappearance’ of goods.” During a previous
project, the group is MoCo,
Moerman’s group pioneered a system to track and trace containers exploiting low- power wireless networks. Using different power modes to economise on energy usage, the developers optimised the transmitter devices, rendering them low-maintenance and hardy enough to withstand lengthy voyages. “As part of the MoCo project, we designed a communications solution which exploits multi-hop communication from one container to another,” explains Moerman.
“Transmissions are relayed
between adjacent units, until signals finally ‘hop’ to a container (potentially located on the outside of a stack) which possesses internet connectivity. The communications
www.projectsmagazine.eu.com
also considering other applications for the technology – from monitoring garbage bins to parking spaces. As
such, the project
could potentially contribute to the creation of the ‘Internet of Things’; a world in which all objects can be remotely monitored. “Transferring data between the different organisations
involved in the process is complex, as they will
will enable those managing the process to discern if service level agreements have been met. Simultaneously,
it must also
authenticate and authorise stakeholders in a federated way. Not all information should be made uniformly available – as
some
users will necessarily require different privileges to others, and sensitive data must remain confidential.” Although the technology indicates much
shipping require
different levels of access, and may need to monitor varied types of information,” says Hoebeke. “For example, some parties may want to look at temperature in Fahrenheit, whereas others may use centigrade. A means of
translation is critical, so that
information can be accurately monitored and interpreted wherever it is received. This
promise, a complex value chain in which various stakeholders may dispute who covers the cost of tracking services must be carefully negotiated if the fledgling product is to enter the commercial mainstream. “The modules are currently expensive, but if
the goods being transported are high
value then this is a realistic economy for operators,” asserts Moerman. “To be utilised for other products, costs must be reduced. Encouragingly, significantly
our
universal interchange or thus
start-up offers cheaper service than
competitors. We hope that our initial forays into the marketplace will clearly show that the technology is viable, and has the potential to become a future standard for the industry.”
49
a
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68