This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
*MAILBAG


School Transportation News Magazine is published by STN Media Group


MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL…


Editor's note — Last month, NHTSA published a final rule that amends FMVSS 111, requiring all vehicles manufactured as of May 1, 2018, and that weigh less than 10,000 pounds GVWR — including some Type A-1 school buses, but excluding motorcyles and trailers — to be equipped with backup cameras. In the process, NHTSA also renamed the safety standard “Rearview Visibility.” We asked our LinkedIn members what they thought the final rule might


mean to the technological and safety evolution of the school bus. It will be a matter of time that it will be added to bigger school


buses. Motorcoaches have them, RVs have them now. Saying that, they should have made the change for all types of school buses. Wait until a student is killed with a big bus when backing up. It will hit the fan then. If it is good for small school buses, why is it not good for all school buses? How many small buses will be out there in 2018? Life for the small bus is 10 years. So, by 2028, each replacement bus will have them. About 17 percent of school bus collisions are from back- ing each year because the driver does not get out of the bus to look before backing. Tey get out after they hit something. More kids are killed each year with SUVs and cars, not small school buses. When was the last time a child was killed by a small school bus that was backing? When are they going to have a better back-up light so you can see better behind you in the dark? Never. I don’t think it should be under FMVSS 111. It is not a mirror. If it could not stand by itself, it is not needed. Do you know only 22 states have back-up alarms on school buses? Does that mean you take them off in those states? Richard Fisher, Trans-Consult Peyton, Colo.


I can foresee the day when the cameras will become a requirement


on not only the rear, but the front, as well for all weight classes of school buses.


Jim Humphreys, Director of Transportation Duncanville (Texas) ISD


Te only drawback I can think of would be the cost of maintaining


them. But then the possible cost reductions from making the vehicle safer may be more than the cost to maintain them. So, (it’s) probably a wash there. I would think this is a good idea. Kyle Stanchfield, Terminal Manager Johnson School Bus Service Fond Du Lac, Wis.


POS?


I cannot begin to express my outrage at the stupidity of the thinking involved in this study (“Hours-of-Service Rule Remains Controversial Despite Latest Report on Effectiveness,” Jan. 30) which, despite the validity of its findings, is almost trivial compared to the fact that the major cause of most catastrophic accidents, and the major cause of driver fatigue in general, is shift inversion — which we commonly know as “jet lag.” When the HOS regulations were revised a decade ago, a provision was included to limit the start time of any given shift to no more than three hours earlier or later than the start time of the previous shift. Astonishingly, both the UMA and ABA lobbied intensely for an exemption from this critical provision. Te FMCSA exempted them from the revisions altogether. What this study is talking about may have value, but it is an asterisk to the problem that remains.


Ned Einstein, Trans-Alt New York


10 School Transportation News May 2014


The views and opinions in School Transportation News are those of the editorial staff. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board or their organizations. Individuals serving on the board are advisors only and are not responsible for the editorial content.


STN


Publisher Tony Corpin


Editor Ryan Gray


Managing Editor Sylvia Arroyo


Creative Director Vincent Rios


Senior Designer Kimber Horne


Graphic Design Maria Molina


Copy Editor Michelle Fisher


Technical Editor Robert T. Pudlewski


CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Linda Bluth, Peggy Burns, John Whelan, Ned Einstein, Art Gissendaner, Julie Metea, Eric Woolson, Barb Fasing


Vice President Colette Paul


Ad Sales Tony Corpin


Circulation Andrea Hernandez


Marketing Coordinator Diane O'Meara


Marketing Assistant Keelyn Young


Chairman of the Board Bill Paul, STN Media Group


5334 Torrance Blvd., 3rd Floor, Torrance, CA 90503


Tel: 310/792-2226 Fax: 310-792-2231 stnonline.com


EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD:


Denny Coughlin, Consultant; Judith Dupille, Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles; Dick Fischer, Trans-Consult; Ron Love, Delaware DOE; Randy McLerran, National Bus Sales; Pete Meslin, Newport-Mesa Unified; Nancy Netherland, Migrant- Seasonal Head Start; Marshall Casey, Consultant; Alexandra Robinson, NAPT; Launi Schmutz, Washington County


Schools


HOW TO WRITE OR E-MAIL STN SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION NEWS welcomes expressions of all views. Letters should be brief and are subject to editing for grammar, style and space. Submissions must be legible, include a signature, job title/ employer name, valid mailing and/or e-mail address, and telephone number. Unsigned letters or letters signed only with a pseudonym or initials will not be used. Email letters to: sylvia@stnonline.com or ryan@stnonline.com or send via U.S. Post to: School Transportation News P.O. Box 789, Redondo Beach,


CA 90277


For permission to reuse materials in this publication contact STN editor Ryan Gray, at ryan@stnonline.com, or by phone at 310/792-2226 or by


fax at 310-792-2231. Material in this publication may not be reproduced in any form without written permission. Printed in the U.S.A


Publication Mail Agreement No. 40065374


Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: Station A, PO Box 54 Winsor, ON N9A 6J5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68