This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Medical Malpractice


under Ahlborn, it was entitled to assert its claim “against all medical expense categories in the damage allocation” including (1) those sums allocated to cover “past medical expenses paid by sources other than Medicaid” and (2) those sums allocated to cover “future medical expenses.” Id. at 393. In holding that Idaho could seek reimbursement out of


that portion of the settlement intended to compensate for past medical expenses paid by sources other than Medicaid, the Matey court relied upon an Idaho statutory provision which gives the State a “priority” right to “an amount received from a third party…which can reasonably be construed to compensate the recipient for the occurrence giving rise to the need for medical assistance…whether or not the recipient is made whole by the amount recovered.” I.C. §56-209(b)(5). Noting that federal law “requires” a state medical plan to contain such provisions, the court held:


Te Ahlborn decision did not affect a state’s ability to assert its priority to recovery of damages attributable to medical expenses. Indeed, the Supreme Court stated that 42 U.S.C. §1396k(b) requires “that the State be paid first out of any damages representing payments for medical care before the recipient can recover any of her own costs for medical care.” Ahlborn, 547 U.S. at 282. Tus, the


Department was clearly entitled, as it argued both below and before this Court, to assert its claim against the amount allocated to other past medical expenses paid.


Id. at 393. Tis aspect of the Matey decision is wrong for many


reasons. First, federal law simply does not “require” that a State medical assistance plan have a provision “like I.C. §56- 209(b)(5)” which purports to create a “priority right” in States to recover damages attributable to medical expenses “whether or not the recipient is made whole by the amount recovered.” In fact, it was just this kind of statutorily created “priority right” that the Supreme Court struck down in Ahlborn as inconsistent with federal law.7 Second, the Supreme Court did not state “that 42


U.S.C. §1396k(b) requires ‘that the State be paid first out of any damages representing payments for medical care before the recipient can recover any of her own costs for medical care.’” Ahlborn’s actual discussion of 42 U.S.C. §1396k(b) is as follows:


Finally, ADHS points to the provision requiring that, where the State actively pursues recovery from the third


7 Arkansas, through its statute, claimed a “priority lien” on a recipient’s recovery entitling the State to full reimbursement of its entire claim out of the proceeds of any recovery, regardless of how much of the recovery was attributable to past medical expenses paid by the State. 547 U.S. at 278-9.


Maryland Orthopedics, P.A. Board Certified Orthopedic Surgeons


Ellicott City ♦ 3570 St. Johns Lane 410-461-9500 Laurel ♦ 545 Main Street 301-776-2000


Owings Mills ♦ Physicians Pavillion, 10085 Red Run Blvd. 410-363-0777 Frederick ♦ 75 Thomas Johnson Drive 301-663-0009 WHEN QUALITY COUNTS


At Maryland Orthopedics PA, our physicians and staff pride themselves on their expertise with Personal Injury cases and work-related injuries covered under Worker’s Compensation. We understand the special challenges presented by industrial injuries and can provide many services such as x-ray, medications, neurological testing and physical therapy in house.


Most Appointments within 24 Hours Monday-Friday


Raymond D. Drapkin, M.D. William J. Launder, M.D. Kevin E. McGovern, M.D.


Michael A. Franchetti, M.D. Mark A. Cohen, M.D. Susan J. Liu, M.D.


Arthur E. Kurlanzik, M.D. ♦ Neurological Services Trial Reporter / Summer 2010 37


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68