This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Medical Malpractice


state law and invalidated Arkansas’ assertion of its statutory lien against any portion of her award except that intended to compensate for past medical expenses. Because Ahlborn’s settlement had resulted in a recovery


of only one sixth of the total value of her claimed damages, she had recovered only one sixth of each category of damages, and specifically had recovered only one sixth of her claim for past medical expenses. Ahlborn argued that the state’s lien for past medical expenses could be satisfied only out of funds actually recovered by her on the claim for past medical expenses, and that any effort to satisfy the lien out of other portions of her recovery violated federal law. Arkansas countered that the settlement proceeds – at least to the extent of past medical expenses paid by the Program – never became Ahlborn’s “property” as they had been previously and automatically assigned to the state as a condition of Medicaid eligibility before ever reaching her hands. And if the proceeds were never Ahlborn’s property, Arkansas argued, the assertion of a lien against such proceeds did not offend the federal statutory prohibition against liens on the property of a Recipient on account of benefits correctly paid. Te Supreme Court accepted Ahlborn’s argument over that of Arkansas. In the Court’s view, the statutory “assignment” of Ahlborn’s rights


to recover as a condition of eligibility for medical assistance benefits did not change the fact that Arkansas was asserting a lien against Ahlborn’s property.


Te terms that Arkansas employs to describe the mechanism by which it lays claims to the settlement proceeds do not, by themselves, tell us whether the statute violates the anti-lien provision. Although denominated an “assignment,” the effect of the statute here was not to divest Ahlborn of all her property interest; instead, Ahlborn retained the right to sue for medical care payments, and the State asserted a right to the fruits of that suit once they materialized. In effect, and as at least some of the statutory language recognizes, Arkansas has imposed a lien on Ahlborn’s property. Since none of the federal third-party liability provisions excepts that lien from operation of the anti-lien provision, its imposition violates federal law.


Id. at 286 (emphasis added) (citations omitted). Maryland law is similar to Arkansas law in that despite


the “deemed assignment” of “any rights to payment for medical care services from any third party who has the


Continued on page 34


THE MOST DIRECT WAY TO GET


WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRESCRIPTIONS TO THE INJURED WORKER


We’re IWP – a national patient-advocate pharmacy that provides medications to injured workers. We help ensure they’ll get the prescription care they need, whether their claim is disputed or not. We ship right to the patient’s door even during litigation and the insurance company pays us.


There are no out-of-pocket expenses for the patient, physician or attorney on approved claims. We help reduce the time and energy spent on prescriptions and paperwork, while making


sure injured


workers receive the care they deserve. To learn more, call us at 888-321-7945.


Watch our video at IWPharmacy.com to learn more about how IWP assists injured workers and all those who support them.


10-IWP-051-GavelAdResize_V1.indd 1


VERSION: 1 BLEED: —


PROGRAM:


DATE: 4/12/10 InDesign


TRAFFIC: Vanessa G.


JOB: 10-IWP-051 Erica H.


Trial Reporter / Summer 2010 31 4/12/10 3:01:52 PM


BY SIGNING YOUR INITIALS BELOW, YOU ARE STATING THAT YOU HAVE READ AND APPROVED THIS WORK.


77 North Washington


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68