This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Potential Jurors. Paper presented at the Speech Communica- tion Association convention (Chicago).


Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions for Specialized Jury Selection Procedures. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina New Bern Division (1989). www.dcfpg.org/motions/alaska/trial/jurysel2.htm.


Mize, Gregory E. (1999). On Better Jury Selection: Spotting UFO Jurors Before They Enter the Jury Room. Court Review, Spring, 10-15.


Motion to Permit Counsel to Question Jurors During Voir Dire and Memorandum to Support, United States of America v. Deric Frank, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 97-CR-269(DLC).


Nisbett, Richard E. & Wilson, Timothy DeCamp (1977). Tell- ing More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.


Padawer-Singer, Alice M., Affidavit in re Antitrust Actions, No. 4-71 Civ. 435 (C.D. Minn.).


Pearson, Robert W. (1992). Personal Recall and the Limits of Retrospective Questions in Surveys.


In Tanur, Judith M.,


ed.,‘Questions About Questions: Inquiries in the Cognitive Bases of Surveys (Russell Sage Foundation).


Rosenberg, Milton J. (1965). When Dissonance Fails: On Elimi- nating Evaluation Apprehension from Attitude Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 28-42.


Saks, Michael J. (1997). What Do Jury Experiments Tell Us about How Juries (Should) Make Decisions. Southern Califor- nia Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 6, 1-53.


Sarbin, Theodore R. (1976). Contextualism: A World View for Modern Psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.


Seltzer, Richard, Venutti, M., & Lopes, G. (1991). Juror Hon- esty During the Voir Dire.


Journal of Criminal Justice, 19,


451-462. Silverthorn v. United States, 400 F.2d 627, 638 (9th


cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1022 (1971).


Starr, V. Hale and McCormick, Mark, Jury Selection (1985) (Little, Brown).


Suggs, David & Sales, Bruce D. (1981). Juror Self-Disclosure in the Voir Dire: A Social Science Analysis. Indiana Law Jour- nal, 56, 367-388.


United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856, 879 (9th Cir. 1974).


Van Voris, Bob (1999). Voir Dire Tip: Pick Former Juror. Na- tional Law Journal, November 1, A1.


Williams, J. Allen (1968). Interviewer Role Performance: A Fur- ther Note on Bias in the Information Interview. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 287-294.


Wu, C. & Shaffer, D.R. (1987). Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experi- ence with the Attitude Object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.


Cir.1968),


Fall 2005


Trial Reporter


27





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52