This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Deal Maker of the Year Awards 2013


WINNER - HOULIHAN LOKEY DEAL: BTA Bank $11.1bn Restructuring


COMPANY: Houlihan Lokey WEBSITE: www.hl.com


UK


DEAL OVERVIEW Q restructuring?


What was the background to the


In 2009, BTA Bank J.S.C., then the #1 retail and corporate bank in Kazakhstan, was forced to restructure $12.2bn in external financial indebtedness after taking significant provisions on its loan book following the discovery of fraud by senior management. This first restructuring resulted in $6.0bn in creditor writedowns and left sovereign wealth fund Samruk-Kazyna the owner of 81.5% of the bank in exchange for a $5.9bn capital contribution.


Post-restructuring, BTA failed to recover its prior market position, and in Q1 2012 the bank defaulted on the second ever interest payment due on its newly restructured debt and announced that, under its existing capital structure, the bank would be facing a $6.0bn capital hole by year end 2012.


Houlihan Lokey acted as a financial advisor to BTA’s 10 member Steering Committee.


Q Q


What challenges were presented and how were these overcome?


Given the size of the capital hole, maximising creditor recoveries hinged primarily upon negotiating a higher capital contribution from Samruk-Kazyna. This was made all the more challenging by BTA’s previous failed government bail-out: liquidation of the bank


50 www.finance-monthly.com


What was Houlihan Lokey’s role in the transaction?


was a real and credible threat. In the end, we were able to negotiate a $2.8bn capital contribution by Samruk, of which $1.6bn was cash by way of a deeply subordinated loan. This was essential to meeting the objectives of bondholders who had decreased confidence in the bank’s business plan coming out of a second round restructuring. In the final transaction, senior bondholders received more than 95% of their recovery in day one cash, as compared to the company’s initial proposal in which bondholders’ full recovery was in the form of restructured BTA bonds.


In parallel to debtor-side negotiations, Houlihan Lokey mediated some equally difficult discussions between the diverse creditor constituencies represented on the


FIRM PROFILE


Houlihan Lokey is an international investment bank with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, financial restructuring and valuation. The firm serves corporations, institutions, and governments worldwide with offices in Europe, the United States, and Asia. Independent advice and intellectual rigour are hallmarks of our commitment to client success across our advisory services. Houlihan Lokey is ranked globally as the No. 1 restructuring advisor, the No. 1 M&A fairness opinion advisor over the past 10 years, and the No. 1 M&A advisor for U.S. transactions under $3 billion, according to Thomson Reuters. For more information, please visit www.HL.com


Steering Committee which included original par lenders, opportunistic secondary players, public sector agencies and trade finance creditors. Resolving complex intercreditor conflicts was as instrumental to the success of the transaction as was negotiating with the company and Samruk.


The deal that was eventually struck significantly exceeded market expectations for both the bank’s Recovery Units and Senior Bonds: recoveries for these classes were approximately 2.5x their market value when the Steering Committee was formed. At the same time, the restructuring also achieved trade finance and public sector creditors’ objectives with the delivery of restructured debt that preserved the nominal amount of their claims.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102