in freeze up and a similar advance in break up
16
. These break ups occur when both forces are reduced to a mini-
mirror the longer term response rates found by Mag- mum and the ice cover simply melts away, similar to the
nuson and others
8
but caution is required in relying on way lake ice melts. By contrast, the largest floods are pro-
such simple temperature-based relationships because duced when the two opposing forces are greatest – a large
they can change over time
6,17
. flood wave colliding with a strong, intact ice cover
4
.
Large-scale, comprehensive records of river and lake-ice
thickness are relatively rare. One data set compiled for
Water level
(m above
Canada over the last 50 years
18
does not reveal any ob-
sea level)
vious trends over the latter part of the 20th century
19
,
although smaller-scale regional trends in Northern Eu- 220
rope and Asia have shown a tendency to thinner ice over
l
e
v
e
l
the same period
20
.
a
t
e
r
218
w
Due to the complex relationship between climate and
216
i
c
e
-
j
a
m
freshwater ice conditions
6,21
, future projections of river and
u
m
lake ice have largely relied on the temperature-based rela-
m
tionships described above. Projections generally indicate
214 a
x
i
O
p
e
n
-
w
a
t
e
r
le
v
e
ls
1990 open
water peak
flow
M
further delays in freeze up and further advances in break
up, with the amount of change depending on the degree
212
0 4 000 8 000 12 000
of warming that is forecast
10,22
. For accurate prediction of
many ice characteristics, such as composition, thickness,
Discharge (m
3
/s)
strength and even duration, however, the complicating ef-
Observed annual maximum water
levels during spring break-up,
fects of snow cover need to be considered
2,23–26
.
1962-1996
Figure 8.3: Example of enhanced water levels produced from
River flows, break up and flooding
river ice, Liard River (Canada). The lower curve shows the corre-
spondence between river flow and water levels under open-wa-
ter conditions. The much greater maximum water levels possi-
River-ice break up on cold-region rivers is often the most ble under ice-jam conditions are illustrated by the upper curve.
dramatic hydrologic event of the year and capable of pro- The transition in break-up severity from dynamic to thermal
ducing flood-level conditions exceeding those possible
break-up effects (see text) is depicted by the gradually shaded
under higher flows during the open-water period
1
(Fig-
area between the two curves. Dots are observed annual maxi-
ure 8.3). In temperate climates, river ice can go through
mum water levels during the spring break up. The 1990 dashed
line shows the maximum recorded flow for the Liard River – but
a series of freeze-up/break-up cycles, whereas in colder
note that the water level corresponding to this peak flow is lower
climates break up is typically a spring event. In either
than for many break-up events with much lower flows. Effects of
case, break up starts when the driving forces – primarily
climate on snowmelt runoff and ice characteristics will lead to
the flood wave from snowmelt, sometimes augmented by regional changes in break-up severity and associated frequency
rainfall – exceed the resisting forces operating to keep the
and magnitude of ice-induced flooding.
ice cover intact (ice thickness and strength). The mildest Source: Based on Prowse and others 2002a
27
CHAPTER 8 RIVER AND LAKE ICE 205
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238