over the past decade
14
. The thinning of the ice shelves, charge of ice from outlet glaciers into the ocean
22
. In par-
apparently from ocean currents that are on average ticular, the speeds of three of Greenland’s fastest glaciers
0.5°C warmer than freezing, is mirrored by the thinning approximately doubled since 2000
28,29
, although two of
and acceleration of their tributary glaciers
15,16
. These ac- them have partially slowed since
30
. The third glacier,
celerating glaciers drain a region widely believed to be Jakobshavn Isbrae (Figure 6A.6), increased its speed to
the most vulnerable portion of the WAIS because its bed about 14 km per year
28
after rapid thinning and break up
is so deep below sea level. Collapse of the entire region of its floating ice tongue
31
, without any signs of slowing
into the sea would raise sea level by about 1 m. down. The bed is very deep for several tens of kilome-
tres inland, allowing seaward parts of the glacier to float
Elsewhere, recent detailed high-resolution satellite im- and break up as the ice thins. By contrast, nearby gla-
agery charted the simultaneous rise and compensating ciers with shallow beds have only small thinning rates,
fall of a score of patches on the Antarctic Ice Sheet, re- indicating a strong linkage between bed topography and
flecting extensive water movement under the ice and glacier vulnerability to change.
pointing to the potentially destabilizing effect of subgla-
cial water
17–19
. Although the volumes of water are tiny In addition, marked increases in ice velocity occurring
in terms of sea-level change, the observations reveal a soon after periods of heavy surface melting suggest that
widespread, dynamic subglacial water system, which meltwater draining to the base of the ice lubricates gla-
may exert an important control on ice flow, and hence cier sliding
32
(Figure 6A.7). This indicates that increased
on the mass balance of the entire ice sheet. melting in a warmer climate could cause an almost si-
multaneous increase in ice-discharge rates.
Greenland (see Figure 6A.5)
Mass-balance estimates for Greenland show thicken- Outlook for the ice sheets
ing at high elevations since the early 1990s at rates that
increased to about 4 cm per year after 2000, consistent For many reasons, it is not possible now to predict the fu-
with expectations of increasing snowfall in a warming ture of the ice sheets, in either the short or long term, with
climate. However, this mass gain is far exceeded by loss- any confidence
33
. Modeling ice sheet dynamic behaviour
es associated with large increases in thinning of the ice is seriously hampered by a paucity of observational data
sheet near the coast. about the crucial, controlling conditions at the ice-sheet
bed
2,34
. It is because of these uncertainties that the projec-
Total loss from the ice sheet more than doubled, from tions of the IPCC 4th Assessment Report, while includ-
a few tens of billions of tonnes per year in the early ing contributions from Greenland and Antarctica at the
1990s
20
, to about 100 billion tonnes per year after 2000
27
, increased rates observed for 1993–2003, state that “larger
with perhaps a further doubling by 2005
24
. These rap- values cannot be excluded, but understanding of these
idly increasing losses result partly from more melting effects is too limited to assess their likelihood or provide
during warmer summers, and partly from increased dis- a best estimate or an upper bound for sea level rise”
35
.
CHAPTER 6A ICE SHEETS 107
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238