RADAR REFLECTORS
Which refl ector
How the tests
Radar
were conducted
Scanner
Direct Path
The test day was hot with a gentle
Reflector
northerly breeze and high atmospheric
pressure at 1028mb. A halyard was rigged
half way along the starboard spreader on
works best?
the HR352, 5.9m above the deck. Gaffer
tape was stuck to the deck to mark the
Surface Reflected Path
10° and 20° angles, a distance of 1.040m
and 2.147m aft respectively. Beginning at
Designers of passive refl ectors do their best to choose a combination of angles of
a range of one nautical mile, we viewed
metal plates or lenses that work together to best refl ect signals.
the boat with no reflector up, then hoisted
each reflector in turn, first vertically, then at
10° and 20° of heel. We also viewed the
created by surface plane intersections. answer. Designers of passive refl ectors, boat without a reflector and checked the
RCS is shown in square metres; the higher therefore, do their best to work out what radar reflective performance of a pressure
the number, the better the refl ector should combination of angles of metal plates or cooker. Progressively we increased the
be. We decided that because this was a lenses work together to best refl ect the range, eliminating products that failed to
practical evaluation, not a theoretical test, signal back in the direction it came, with improve the target on the radar.
we would not compare quoted RCS as little as possible of the signal shooting All tests were done stern-on, or nearly
fi gures, because it could cause confusion, off in the wrong direction. Most designers so, to give as small a ‘paint’ as possible.
particularly as they can be quoted either then put their collection of plates and A problem we had was that the HR352
as a peak value, a mean value or lenses into a housing so they look nice. seems to be quite a good radar reflector
sometimes even as SPL (Specifi ed The casings also help to hold the all on her own. On a normal day this
Performance Level). component parts together. would be quite surprising, because the
Without a radar refl ector, a small boat boat does not have a very wide transom.
will have an RCS that varies radically How active reflectors work We are confident that the high pressure,
with the aspect. It will be small from Active type refl ectors are more correctly combined with very calm water, caused
ahead and astern and peak when beam on. known as Radar Target Enhancers (RTE). the boat on her own (without a reflector
Adding a radar refl ector should even this We reviewed the science behind these in up) to be visible at a greater distance
Radar
out, but the effect will only be noticeable
Min Signal
the Tech Talk section of ST148. In a than would normally be the case in our
when you get to the range where the RCS
Max Signal
nutshell, each device has two antennae – climate. (See the test results later where
of the refl ector – which will be mounted Sea Surface one for receive and the other for transmit this is explained.)
high up – is bigger than that of the boat. – and a power amplifi er. The incoming The tracking boat was a Nelson
A large RCS does not mean that the radar pulse is picked up by the receive 42 fitted with a Raymarine HD digital
‘blob’ made by your boat on a radar will antenna, passed through the amplifi er and radar. The scanner, a 4ft open array,
be bigger, it means it is more likely to be is re-transmitted through the transmit giving a 1.5° beam width, was mounted
there on each sweep and will be more antenna. A 12V DC supply is needed to approximately 4m above sea level. The
visible against background clutter. Finally, power the amplifi er. The RCS of active display, from which all the screen shots
the curvature of the earth ultimately limits refl ectors is much greater than that of were recorded, was the Raymarine E120.
the range at which you can be seen. The passive ones, probably by a factor of 10.
higher your refl ector and the higher the
radar, the greater this is. Beyond about X-band and S-band
eight miles, even with a passive refl ector, Radars operate in one of two frequency
the returns may be so weak that you will bands, X-band and S-band. Radars on
not be detected. This is where the stronger small craft operate in X-band (8-12GHz);
returns of the active refl ector will big ships carry both X-band and S-band
defi nitely win out. (2-4GHz) radars. S-band radars are too
big for small craft, because they work on
Bouncing it back a lower frequency/longer wavelength, so
Passive refl ectors are designed to mirror have much larger antennae. S-band is best
the incoming radar wave and bounce it for long range target tracking and when
back whence it came. In theory, the best the weather is poor, because the lower
passive radar refl ector is a fl at metal plate, frequency is less affected by rain and
aimed square on to the incoming signal. choppy sea conditions. X-band is better in
The problem with that design is that you good weather and at shorter range.
don’t know where the signal is coming in Passive radar refl ectors are optimised for
from, so can’t aim it back. There’s also X-band and work to a lesser degree in S-
the problem of the boat pitching, rolling band. Current active radar refl ectors work
and yawing, so clearly a fl at plate isn’t the only in X-band.
RDELL • ACTIVE-X • SEA-ME • ECHOMAX •
September 09 Sailing Today 53
ST149 Grp Radar
Reflect_RTG.indd45 45 16/7/09 14:14:20
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156