search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EIGHT HUNDRED & NINETY-FIVE FEET


by Tommy Marciniak, Corporate Marketing Manager, Trinity Shoring Products, Inc. E


ight hundred and ninety-five feet. That was the dis- tance Chicago-based contractor James McHugh Construction Company had to install 84” rein- forced concrete pipe (RCP) as part of the WB


I-290 Flyover Project. McHugh subcontracted Dynamicx Enterprises (Chicago) to install the shoring, and tunneling contractor LJ Keefe Company (Mt. Prospect, Ill.) to do the pipe jacking/tunneling. Keefe planned to use a 102” diameter tunnel boring machine (TBM). This is simple enough on the surface, but below the surface is where things get interesting.


In order to do the tunneling, LJ Keefe required a jacking pit with an inside dimension of 20’ wide x 40’ long x 32’ deep. They needed 24’ clear (minimum) in the front bay of the pit to bring in pipe and remove soil. The tunneling also required a thrust block 12’ high x 22’ wide x 8’ thick. The receiving pit had an inside dimension of 21’ ¼” wide x 29’ 4 ¼” long x 25’ deep.


“For a project like this, normally we would quote a slide rail system,” noted Bill Stanley, Sales Representative for Lee Jensen Sales, out of Crystal Lake and New Lenox, Ill.


We were within 5’ of active traffic on Westbound I-290 for both the receiving and jacking pits, as well as having a build- ing 65’ from the receiving pit; we had to come up with some- thing else. As we started digging into the parameters of the project, it was about as challenging as you’d see for an earth retention system: tight work spaces, deep cuts, poor soils, heavy surcharge loads and large clearances—horizontal and vertical—required.”


That nearby building proved to be a big area of concern for the whole project. Officials were concerned about building set- tlement, roadway and bridge support, as well as many active utilities in the area. As such, they put into place the require- ment that any shoring used could deflect no more than 1”.


“When Lee Jensen Sales contacted us about the project, my first thought was it could be done using Slide Rail,” mentioned Joshua Thorne, Pro-Tec Equipment’s Shoring Manager, “but when the talk of no more than 1” deflection came up, I knew that could only be done by one thing: sheeting. For Pro-Tec Equipment, that meant the Pro-Brace.”


View of the tunneling pit for the WB I-290 Flyover project.


The project’s jacking or tunneling pit had an inside dimension of 20’ wide x 40’ long x 32’ deep.


46 THE WHO’S WHO IN BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION SPONSORED CONTENT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134