EDITORIAL


Watch the Pendulum Swing T


he Annual Modern Casting Census of World Casting Production is one of our favorite projects each year. Published in


December, this feature (p. 21) provides a snapshot of the state of metalcasting globally. It is a one- of-a-kind feature that is much-relied upon throughout the industry. Tis year, while


reviewing the data, I was struck by the different perspec- tive with which the North American metalcasting industry approaches the global market compared to five years ago. A significant shift has occurred that few, if any, saw coming. Tis has brought a renewed energy to North American metalcasting. “Manufacturing


Te success of your casting facility still


depends as much on the decisions you and your management


team make as on macroeconomic factors.


cost competitiveness around the world has changed dramatically over the past decade…so dramatically that many old perceptions of low-cost and high-cost nations no longer hold…Mexico now has lower average manu- facturing costs than China…China’s manufacturing- cost advantage over the U.S. has shrunk to less than 5%. Costs in Eastern European nations are at parity or above costs in the U.S.” This quote is from the report, Global Manu-


facturing Cost Competiveness Index, released by the Boston Consulting Group in April of this year. While it is about general manufacturing, these ideas resonate within our niche of casting manufacturing.


GE announced in November plans to invest


$60 million into its recently acquired Lufkin, Texas, casting facility to expand and modernize the ductile and gray iron plant to create a simpli- fied production flow, improve employee working conditions and provide customers with improved quality and delivery. The plan is to add 72,000 sq. ft. of new casting space while refurbishing


Alfred T. Spada, Publisher/Editor-in-Chief


If you have any comments about this editorial or any other item that appears in Modern Casting, email me at aspada@afsinc.org.


December 2014 MODERN CASTING | 5


the remaining plant space. According to GE, “The goal is to make the facility as efficient as possible and help strengthen the competitive position of our business around the world.”


In the last 30 years, GE has


been one of the leaders of the global sourcing movement, shipping many of its castings to suppliers across the globe. Te shift across many of the GE manufactur- ing divisions to re-invest in North American manufacturing says that the pen- dulum has swung back to some extent. Te reasons cited in the report for the


shift include: • Energy costs. • Currency value. • Productivity. • Wage rates.


While this information is positive as


you look to the future, the success of your casting facility still depends as much on the decisions you and your management


team make as on macroeconomic factors. Your cast- ing facility must focus on what it can control—mar- keting, HR, production efficiencies, environmental and worker safety initiatives, to name a few—to be successful, because if those departments function at a world-class level, your casting facility can as well.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60