search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The Analysis News & Opinions


Positive review from industry regulator, but more to do


The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has found that many firms are improving the way they deal with customers in early arrears. However, it also warned that areas of potential improvement still exist. The FCA’s review concluded that the


forbearance and repayment solutions offered to customers varied significantly in terms of the range of solutions offered, and the way in which payment difficulties were assessed. It also found that a firm’s culture


influenced the approach taken to giving due consideration and forbearance to customers in arrears difficulties. The review concluded that:


lA small number of firms had a culture that was strongly focused on achieving fair customer outcomes, offered forbearance that supported this and were well organised to deliver forbearance effectively. l Slightly under two-thirds of firms had policies aimed at achieving fair outcomes for customers. However the firm’s intentions and policies were not always carried out by staff in practice. l Around a third of the firms had a culture that was less customer-centric than other companies in the sample and focused on securing payment as fast as possible, often at the expense of giving due consideration to customers’ circumstances. In these firms there was widespread evidence of poor customer outcomes. Jonathan Davidson, executive director of


supervision – retail and authorisations, said: “Firms must treat customers in default or in arrears difficulties with forbearance and due consideration. We found that firms who put customers at the heart of what they do saw benefits of positively engaging and agreeing sustainable repayment solutions. However, we found that firms whose culture was not motivated by securing fair customer outcomes were focused on securing payment as quickly as possible – which could mean delays, undue distress and the avoidable exacerbation of debts before customers with longer-term financial difficulties secured an appropriate repayment solution.


January 2017


“We expect firms to embed a culture


of doing the right thing for the market and for consumers. “We have seen increased engagement and


positive change taking place in the industry when dealing with customers in early arrears. However, as our report outlines, there are a number of areas where there is a need for significant improvement. “We encourage all firms to consider


their culture and approach to customers in financial difficulties and to make improvements where necessary.” Feedback has been given to each of the


firms in the sample on the practices observed in their businesses. These firms will be expected to review their businesses in light of feedback and make relevant changes. Mike O’Connor, chief executive of


StepChange Debt Charity, added: “The FCA’s evidence shows that the treatment of people in arrears is inconsistent across the sector and leaves people facing a lottery as to whether or not they will get the advice and support to help them get back on their feet. “Consistency is crucial when people have


multiple creditors, and consistency in forbearance is particularly critical. “We have long argued for


the


introduction of a statutory ‘breathing space’ scheme. This would help to ensure that


www.CCRMagazine.co.uk


people seeking debt advice are no longer subject to the patchwork of procedures and voluntary forbearance schemes offered by creditors, and ensure that those in financial difficulty get the protections from spiralling debts and enforcement action that they desperately need.” Meanwhile,


the FCA, last month,


launched a market study to consider whether competition in the mortgage sector can be improved. The FCA will decide whether consumers


are empowered to choose on an informed basis between products and services and are in a position to understand whether these represent good value for money. It will set out to consider two questions


in detail: l At each stage of the consumer journey, do the available tools – including advice – help mortgage consumers to make ever more effective decisions? l Do commercial arrangements between lenders, brokers and other players lead to conflicts of interest or misaligned incentives to the detriment of consumers? The FCA will also review whether there


are opportunities for better technological solutions to problems identified, including greater use of digital channels to deliver information or advice.


9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52