search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CCR2 Litigation


most likely to engage with the legal process. We utilise two letters before action and


have a team of trained para-legals who are able to negotiate an immediate cessation in the process if the debt is disputed, or circumstances dictate. Our letters always signpost free help and advice. Even after judgment is obtained, we are


in negotiation with the customer to explain the next steps and registration with the credit reference agencies. LawScore has developed to such an


extent that we are now able to enhance our clients’ own data through our expertise.


Case Study Moriarty Law engaged with a large debt purchaser client in July 2015 in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the Moriarty Law LawScore model. Our debt-purchaser client provided an evaluation file containing 27,750 consumer mobile-phone debts. These accounts had been recalled from


the client’s panel of DCAs and were a combination of post-third and fourth placement. After processing the evaluation file through


our unique scoring model, LawScore, about 16% of these accounts were passed as appropriate for and likely to engage in the legal strategy. Then 4,436 accounts were processed through the Moriarty Law end- to-end legal strategy. This strategy involves a cycle of two


letters before action supported by inbound and outbound telephony activity through our dedicated team of Litigation Executives. The results demonstrated that, despite


failing to engage with the debt collection process, a significant number of cases have the propensity to engage with a robust legal strategy. In this case, LawScore gave a significant


uplift in gross and net recoveries. After analysis of the initial placement, our


client has made further placements from September 2015 and regular placements since then. The performance of subsequent tranches


of debts is consistent with the initial tranche. Our client has since proceeded to trial


other debt types leading to results consistent with the first tranche as we would expect when relying on the LawScore model. We


January 2017


now receive regular placements of: mobile- phone accounts, credit card accounts, mail order accounts, retail finance accounts, and leisure industry accounts. As well as expanding the placement


streams, our client has also reallocated earlier placements to Moriarty Law. This is due to consistency of performance and by


www.CCRMagazine.co.uk


placing accounts earlier in the cycle, this has led to an increase in the percentage of accounts achieving the score threshold. We have become a key strategic


We believe that litigation should only ever be undertaken with the correct checks and protection of those customers who are vulnerable or in obvious financial difficulties


placement in our client's external recovery strategy.


Think Moriarty Law So, think Moriarty Law and think: l Over 100 man years’ experience. l Effective debt recovery. l All court costs are inclusive of our fee. l All balances over £100. l Current collection rates over 30% of accepted accounts. l Portfolios. l Current accounts. l First to fourth placement. lWritten-off dormant accounts.


Get in touch To find out how we can help you to make the right choices on your litigation, call us now on 020 3126 4548 or e-mail us at client.services@moriartylaw.co.uk or Matt Subert on 07791 416493 or at matt.subert@moriartylaw.co.uk.


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52