search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REFRIGERANTS 1. Classify the System


Determine the PED category of each component and the complete system, based on refrigerant type, maximum allowable pressure (PS), and volume or pipe size


 Required for Category II, III, or IV systems, they will review your technical documentation and may need to witness strength testing


 Include system drawings, pressure ratings,


 the design complies with the essential safety requirements, typically by following relevant harmonised or designated standards


4.  Test at the correct pressure; some tests must be witnessed depending on the category


 Apply CE or UKCA mark and issue a Declaration of Conformity.


Hazard categories and how systems are assessed


Individual components in the system and the complete system have a hazard category. This is determined from the type of component (piping, vessel, pressure accessory or safety accessory), the refrigerant, maximum allowable pressure (PS) and size. In essence things which are bigger and/or have greater PS and/or run on a more dangerous refrigerant have a higher hazard category. 


hazard categories. Note the following:  SEP – sound engineering practice. Items and systems do not need to meet the PED’s essential safety requirements and are not CE or UKCA marked


 Category I tems and systems must meet the essential safety requirements, are CE or UKCA 





 Categories II, III and IV must meet the essential safety requirements, are CE or UKCA marked and 


 more onerous the higher the hazard category. For example, for systems which are hazard category


 witness all strength testing. The hazard category of the complete system is simply the highest individual hazard category, ignoring safety accessories such as PRVs which are always category IV. Installing contractors need to be aware of the system hazard category but also the category of all the joints on the system (pipe to pipe and pipe to component):


 Joints which are SEP or category I can be brazed by brazers with an industry standard brazing qual-


 tested at 1.1 x PS.


 Joints which are Category II or higher must be 


 at 1.43 x PS (or 1.1 x PS with 10% non-destructive testing).


Most joints are SEP or category I, but larger R744


 erants (e.g. A2Ls) have joints which are category II or higher.


Risk analysis and essential safety requirements


A risk analysis must be carried out, identifying hazards associated with pressure and showing how they are eliminated or reduced, and what protection methods are used. The essential safety requirements listed in the PED form the basis of this risk analysis. Most of the risks relevant to RACHP systems are met through compliance with harmonised standards.


The most important elements of the risk analysis


cover: Determination of PS Selection of appropriate over-pressure protection  The use of components and assemblies which are rated for the relevant PS and, where required, are CE or UKCA marked in accordance with the PED


 The design of interconnecting pipe work – includ- ing the pipe OD and thickness, its routing and support


 Mounting of components, assemblies and pipe work to minimise vibration


 The brazing or welding of connections, either pipe to pipe or pipe to component


Strength testing of the installed pipework  Protection of personnel from hot surfaces and PRV vents.


Download the ACR News app today


Demonstrating compliance Compliance with the PED is usually demonstrated  documentation). These primarily comprise:


 General description of the system  Design information, including PS and hazard


category for the individual items of pressure equipment and for the whole system


 (thickness) is adequate


The risk analysis Pipe layout drawing as installed 


  sumables) and declarations of conformity for the items of pressure equipment in the system


 procedures


 tests carried out


O&M manual  Draft declaration of conformity and CE plate for the completed system


 for category II, III and IV systems several weeks before the system is to be pressure tested.





you:  Check brazers/welders have the appropriate 


 That all items are rated for your system PS (or higher) and that the over pressure protection prevents the system exceeding PS


 that all items meet the requirements of the PED)


 That you own and have read the relevant stand- ards


 That you pressure test the system safely and to the correct pressure.


Summary The PED is a legal requirement in the UK under the PE(S)R. It is there to ensure pressure systems are safe and in the 23 years since its introduction has led to more consistent design and improved installation practices. The result is safe, more reliable systems with reduced leakage, and of course, compliance with the law. In this short article it is not possible to provide all the information you need to install PED compliant systems and to demonstrate compliance - contact 


www.acr-news.com • August 2025 21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40