search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Canadian Issues DAVID DESCÔTEAUX The Divisive Pipeline Also reacting to the western backlash, albeit more tactfully,


was Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard. According to the premier, if the rest of Canada can reject pipeline projects such as Keystone XL, then Quebec can say no to Energy East. The trouble is, Coderre and Couillard may not be as in touch


with their constituents as they believe. A February Léger poll commissioned by the Montreal Economic Institute found that 59% of Quebecers would prefer that oil imported from outside Quebec come from Western Canada. Even more telling is that the number jumped to 75% among respondents who identify with Couillard’s Liberal Party. What’s more, 41% of Quebecers consider pipelines to be the safest way to transport oil, far ahead of trucks (14%), ships (10%) and trains (9%).


Oil will flow, with or without the pipeline Many opposed to pipeline projects are mostly against oil, period. I’m referring, for example, to environmental groups that, regardless of the means of transport used, would prefer that we give up on oil. In an ideal world, we would reduce our oil consumption — a


I


NSTEAD OF UNITING CANADIANS from the western and eastern provinces, the extension of the TransCanada pipeline has created a chasm. At the centre of the controversy is the Energy East Pipeline


project, a 4,600-km pipeline that would carry crude oil from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries in Eastern Canada. A number of Montreal-area mayors, 82 in all, have said they don’t want Energy East to cut across their territory, sparking outrage from Western Canada. Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall tweeted, “I trust Montreal-area mayors will politely return their share of $10 billion in equalization supported by [the] West.” Others, such as Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, accused some mayors of being “short-sighted” for not recognizing that Energy East would be beneficial to all Canadians. That’s all it took for outspoken Montreal Mayor Denis


Coderre to express indignation, tweeting, “Quebec taxpayers also support Saskatchewan’s projects through federal grants” at hashtag #ditesMerci (say thank you).


20 | CPA MAGAZINE | MAY 2016


noble objective we hope to achieve someday. The potential eco- nomic and environmental benefits to be reaped are undeni- able. But this long-term goal, which mostly hinges on techno- logical advancements, should not be used as an excuse to ignore the reality: oil will remain our primary source of energy for decades to come, and transporting it creates challenges that can’t be avoided simply by chanting, “Let’s free ourselves from oil.” According to a National Energy Board report published this


year, even if no pipelines were to be built for years, Canada’s oil production will increase significantly by 2040 (up to 5.6 million barrels a day from 3.9 million in 2014). And without new pipelines, this oil will have to be transported by train, which isn’t exactly the safest method. Currently, the oil-producing provinces, landlocked in the


middle of the continent, can’t send their production to outside markets, thus preventing Canada from fully capitalizing on the wealth afforded by oil. Pipeline projects are supposed to rectify this situation and generate economic benefits for the entire country. So let’s stop this petty squabbling and make way for discussion and cooperation.


DAVID DESCÔTEAUX is a Montreal-based business columnist


Blair Kelly


Photo: Yanick Dery


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68