search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Technical Paper


Figure 6: Part #1, Consistent shell build and bridging resulting from closer automated part spacing


Figure 4: Part # 2 Example of automated assembly using common tooling


Figure 5: part # 1, 54 part tree showing bridging and shell reduction


molds for casting trials with 7, 8 and 9 parts per bar or 42, 48 and 54 parts per assembly. These additional parts would represent a potential increase in yield of 14 and 28% respectively over the original part layout of 42 parts per tree. Admittedly there was some skepticism over whether the denser assemblies would be able to be cast reliably. The new automated assemblies were run side by side through the foundry.


Initial


results looked promising as there were no visual defects after shell removal. As an extra precaution all parts were run through X-Ray to ensure there were no metallurgical defects such as internal porosity or shrink.


All X-Ray with zero defects.


completed we ran into our first road block.


was decided to only take advantage of the 8 parts per row or 48 parts per tree configuration in production. This is due to the fact that there is a weight limit on


28 ❘ January 2017 ®


Once the casting trials where Despite the positive results it


parts passed


Conclusion Automation reduces variability. When automation starts in the wax room the following benefits are achieved:


• Reduced shell material- the more parts you can put on an assembly the fewer assemblies you will need to dip resulting in reduced shell usage.


• Further shell reductions are produced based on reduced part spacing and bridging.


• Uniform part coverage


all downstream operations. The 54 part tree configuration exceeded this weight limit. Because of the unique End Of Arm Tooling (EOAT) design we are able to easily adjusted the number of parts per runner bar.


Figure 7: Part #1, 8 and 9 parts per weld casting examples


This allowed multiple


casting tests to be run optimizing the pattern spacing in the foundry without effecting the cycle time of the welding operation.


due to presentation of the part in to the slurry


• Increased accuracy of solidification models


• More accurate part cut resulting in reduced gate grind


• Reduced cut off scrap • Reduced scrap due to inclusions


These process gains allow your engineers to focus on corrective actions that focus on problems at the root of their origin.


All parts shown are thanks to Lamo- thermic in Brewster, NY.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36