search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Original half-sheet poster.


will feel insulted by this rushed- through presentation of the Bard of Baker Street.


Richard Valley’s third set of


liner notes is his least meander- ing and most consistently informa- tive. As before, he recapitulates the IMDb listings of various actors, but his attention remains focused as he complements the data with appropriate interview bytes (from the likes of actress Hillary Brooke, Martin Kosleck and UNIVERSAL HORRORS co-author John Brunas) and astute details about which Conan Doyle stories were tapped for which scripts. He does make the occasionally silly pronounce- ment (“PURSUIT TO ALGIERS is the LOVE BOAT of Sherlock Holmes films”) and, when em- barrassed for actual production detail, wastes entire paragraphs on the history of trains in mys- tery thrillers and the “meaning- lessness” of the title DRESSED TO KILL (before finally asserting


it as meaningful!), but the mate- rial is at least competently writ- ten and edited. Apart from a reference to actor Rex Evans as one of George Cukor’s pool boys and a raised eyebrow reference to Ouida Rathbone’s alleged jeal- ousy over her husband’s past relationship with ex-roommate Martin Kosleck, the locker room gossip is thankfully kept to a minimum.


Some closing thoughts: I’ve always been very fond of this se- ries, but until the release of these sets from MPI, I have never watched them all together in correct sequence. To do this is to expose some of their weak- nesses (the substitution of de- ductive process with less clever whodunits, the heavy rotation of supporting cast, the progressive cheapening) as well as their strengths (Neill’s stylish direction, their puckish humor); it also helps to explode one or two


myths, such as the supposed idiocy of Nigel Bruce’s Watson, who has some comic moments and naturally walks several de- ductive steps behind Holmes, but also offers a cumulative portrayal of courage, adventurousness, resourcefulness and sentiment. And then there is Basil Rathbone as Holmes, who has at least one notable rival for the honor in Jer- emy Brett but nevertheless re- mains the definitive interpreter after nearly 60 years. In Rathbone’s performances, we see none of the theatrical flamboyance, none of the neurosis and eccentricity that mark so many other interpreta- tions following in his wake; he simply is Sherlock Holmes, even when acting decidedly unlike him. The series has its ups and downs, as do their presentations here, but taken as a whole, they are a remarkable achievement and MPI’s three sets, as a whole, do them honor.


37

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84