search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Module 3 • Sales forecasting 5. Methods of sales forecasting


Forecasts help determine the following: • The number of salespeople to employ • The amount that can be spend on samples, travel and entertainment.


5.1 Jury of executive opinion


Experts with years of experience are used with this method. Group of executives meet and offer their individual opinions on the forecast for period in question. Individual opinions may be averaged or consensus is reached on the number. It is a subjective method, seeing that each person gives his opinion based on his own experience. It is very useful in situations where no previous data is available, for example, when a new business is started, a new product line is launched or a business plans to sell in a new area/market; thus, in cases where no previous data is available. Executives support their estimates with facts that they have researched for example from specialised magazines, newspapers, talking to other experts in the industry and from reading research reports. .


Advantages • Experience and observations of talented executives with proven track records are used. • The forecast is developed easily and quickly. • Very useful for new products with little or no sales history.


Disadvantages • It is based on experience that cannot be taught or carried over. • It is not scientific. • Group opinion can be strongly influenced by a dominant person in the group. • Group pressures to "agree" may distort individual judgements. • The responsibility of the forecast is spread amongst the group (who is really responsible for the forecast if something goes wrong?).


• It adds to the workload of executives, requiring them to spend time that they would otherwise devote to their areas of main importance.


5.2 Delphi technique


The Delphi technique utilises the opinions of executives without face-to-face discussions. Opinions are given anonymously. This creates a more accurate forecast than the Jury of Executive Opinion. The forecaster will take the predictions of each executive member and combine it into an anonymous summary. The forecaster will then resend it to everyone. Each member then has a chance to study the summary, revise their forecasts, make adjustments or change their opinions. It is then sent back to the forecaster. The process is repeated several times until consensus of opinion is reached.


This is a more structured method and more objective than Jury of Executive opinion because there is no dominant person and no group pressures that will influence one another.


Advantages • Members stay anonymous. • Independent judgements are reached by all individuals. • The Delphi technique is more scientific and systematic as Jury of Executive opinion, because the executives do not communicate with one another and their opinions are systematically processed to develop a consensus.


• It minimizes the effect of group dynamics.


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130