search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CHALLENGES


All told, the Bell 407MRH is an impressive aeronautical accomplishment; one that proves that it is possible to adapt commercial technology for military applications.


According to Adam Gunn, bridging the gap between the two was the hardest part. “Our real efforts went into developing the prototype 407MRH; finding ways to make a commercial platform serve a range of military requirements without compromising the 407GXP’s fundamental characteristics,” he said. “Once we worked out those issues, the rest was relatively easy.”


“The biggest challenges were balancing the military technology with its impact on the 407MRH’s payload capacity and available space,” Gunn said. “The 407GXP is a great aircraft, and the Garmin 1000H is an excellent avionics suite. Our mission was to respect these facts, while adding the military special mission equipment (sensors, weapons, and mounting structures) that provide the multi-role capability that our clients require.”


The 407MRH’s camera system is a good example of what Southeast/NorthStar and its other partners had to contend with. Before FLIR developed the lightweight Star SAFIRE 260-HLD turret – delivering six payloads within a 9-10” gyro-stabilized unit – the thought of having to use a larger turret weighing 100+ lbs or more haunted the helicopter’s design team.


“Every pound of mass that we had to allocate to the turret took away from our remaining payload capacity,” McDougall said. “Having IR, visible light, and low light cameras and a good laser designator inside a ~55 lbs gimbal made a big difference.” Similar solutions like the 407MRH’s lightweight carbon fiber door minimized the demands on the helicopter’s payload capacity, thereby maximizing its performance.


70


May/June 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86