This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
additives | Film applications


Figure 4: Product characteristics for a range of mineral additives suitable for enhancing film blocking and optical properties Product


Trefil 1313-400 Trefil 1313-600 Sikron SF 4000 anhydrite


d50 [µm]


Hardness (Mohs) Density [g/cm3] Brightness


Fe2O3 [weight %] 6


3.5 3.0


Y=85 0.1


Source: HPF The Mineral Engineers


applications can be challenging in terms of slip and antiblocking as well as antistatic performances when adding conventional polyethylene-based masterbatch- es, as their mode of action is influenced by the polarity of these resins or their properties like stickiness,” the company says. For this reason, it has developed masterbatches optimised for performance in EVA and ionomers resins.


Below: Pumice has been shown to provide good film antiblock and haze performance


Tackling blocking Mitsui Plastics describes its Silton antiblock as a standard in Asia for LLDPE film producers requiring good anti-block performance together with high clarity and gloss and low haze. The synthetic zeolite-based additive is said to work well with both migratory and non-migratory slip agents, including erucamide and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Due to its narrow particle size distribution, round particle shape and relatively high bulk density, the additive is easy to feed and disperse. Silton particle sizes range from 2-7 microns as stand- ard, with most industry applications using 3 and 5 micron grades based on film thickness and application. As a result of its high clarity and gloss and low haze,


Silton is currently used predominantly in food, cosmet- ics and medical packaging film applications, according to Mitsui, where it is said to outperform talc, DE (diatomaceous earth) and synthetic silica. The company


claims that the Silton antiblock produces 50-60% less haze in films when compared to synthetic silica. In a blown Dowlex 2045 LLDPE film application, it says clarity and gloss was held to within 2% and 1% of the unmodified resin while haze was only affected by 0.1% (Figure 3). Functional high performance additives based on


mineral raw materials are also highly suitable for influencing various properties of plastic films, according to HPF The Mineral Engineers. Among various studies the company has carried out recently was one exploring packaging films with anti-blocking and good optical properties. It compared its Trefil anhydrite (a waterless sulphate), Sikron cristobalite (based on pure silica), Microspar potash feldspar, and pumice. HPF says the effectiveness of the anti-blocking


additive is mainly dependent on the properties of the mineral used and the grain size, so the study included Trefil anhydrite and pumice grades with different average particle sizes. It looked at Trefil 1313-400 and 1313-600, Sikron SF 4000, Microspar 1380-600 and Pumice NCS Grade 3 and Grade 8 (Figure 4). The company concluded that Trefil 1313-600 offered


very good anti-blocking properties but does not do so well on appearance; Sikron SF 4000 showed good values on antiblocking and optical properties; Microspar 1380-600 exhibited the lowest haze and offered very good anti-blocking values; while Pumice NCS Grade 3 and 8 showed both good anti-blocking values and low haze.


Click on the links for more information: ❙ www.akzonobel.comwww.adeka.co.jpwww.pcc-chemax.comwww.palsgaard.comwww.polyone.comwww.polyfilcorp.comwww.polymerdynamix.comwww.ampacet.comwww.mitsuiplastics.comwww.hpfminerals.com


58 COMPOUNDING WORLD | January 2017 www.compoundingworld.com


anhydrite 3


3.5 3.0


Y=89 0.1


6.5


2.35 Y=97 0.03


Microspar


cristobalite 1380-600 feldspar 5


3


6.0 2.6


Y>90 0.05


Pumice NCS Pumice NCS Grade 3


3.6


n.b. 6


Y = 93 1


Grade 8 8.5


n.b. 6


Y = 92 1


PHOTO: HPF MINERALS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90