CONSTRUCTION & SITE SAFETY


SWEAT THE SMALL STUFF


Smaller assembly tools pose just as great a health and safety risk as hammer tools when it comes to industrial noise and vibration, warns Bill Harrison, technical manager at Trescal UK.


Noise and vibration are two of the most common industrial injuries. The Health and Safety Executive estimates that more than a quarter of a million people in the UK now have injuries related to hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Some 18,000 people have noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) that was caused or made worse by work.


HAVS is caused by prolonged use of vibrating hand-held machinery which is known to have a serious effect on nerves, joints, muscles, blood vessels or connective tissues of the hand and forearm. This leads to a tingling ‘whiteness’ or numbness of the fingers in its mildest form. In its most severe form, it causes considerable pain and loss of manual dexterity.


Vibrating machinery is also often noisy. Riveting guns operate at circa 100-120 decibels which, when you consider that a jet engine is only circa 140 decibels at take-off, is very loud.


The key legislation in regards to HAVS and vibration white finger (VWF) is the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005, which includes a statutory daily limit on the amount of vibration an individual can be exposed to. Noise is controlled by the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005.


However, while HAVS and noise related injuries are widely accepted and understood, it would be wrong to assume they are only a concern for smaller manufacturers or those with lax health and safety procedures.


Only last year, a global manufacturer of power generation equipment was prosecuted after one of its employees was left with a severe long-term disability following prolonged working with a range of vibrating tools. Four other employees were


38


diagnosed with having symptoms consistent with early stage HAVS, commonly known as white-finger.


The court found that the company in question had failed to manage the exposure of its employees to the serious risks of vibration for more than 10 years and had failed to put preventive measures in place.


The case highlighted a common problem in industry, namely that risk analysis for HAVS and noise is all-too- often confined to larger equipment, such as grinders, chainsaws and hammer tools, which present a clear danger to employees.


However, among the most common triggers is smaller air powered industrial equipment used in assembly facilities, such as nutrunners, pneumatic impact guns, riveters, pneumatic torque wrenches and air tools, which possess an inherent risk to employees but are often overlooked.


This situation is exacerbated by the fact that this type of equipment is often neglected, seldom getting the care and attention given to more expensive equipment. A nutrunner, for example, is rarely given any sort of maintenance because, given the low unit cost, replacement is preferable to repair if anything goes wrong.


Inevitably, this leaves employers at risk of litigation and, if the correct procedures and measurements have not been followed, prosecution and fines.


Measurement is the key. For example, an employee using a tool with significant vibration, circa 5 m/ s2


for one hour would be regarded


as being below the exposure action value. However, as soon as the same employee begins using the same


tool for three hours per day, they are regarded as being above the exposure action value and at risk.


An untested tool will be subject to wear and tear which has the capacity to increase both vibration and noise. For example, wear and tear on a bearing will increase vibration significantly. If an employer is found not to have put in place simple procedures to spot and rectify this sort of simple maintenance issue, the company’s ability to fight a claim will be limited.


One way of mitigating the threat is regular inspection and testing to ensure the tool is working correctly and in line with the relevant regulations. This should be implemented by a supplier from outside the company who is able to issue independent certification.


Vibrating hand-held tools should be inspected and tested at least every six months. If the tool is being used constantly on a 24 hour basis, this should be brought forward to every three months.


The issue here is peace of mind. Once the equipment has been checked, validated and certification has been issued, there is an audit trail which can be used in any future defence action.


www.trescal.com www.tomorrowshs.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64