search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Having been through this preliminary patter, and flying at 2,000ft, I agreed with K. on a space we could land in, asking him to note with very particular care precisely what our position was, in terms of our height, airspeed, course and exact point above the ground. I then closed the throttle and carried on to demonstrate the perfect (or as perfect as my skills could make it) descent and approach. We then climbed back again to exactly where I had closed the throttle, flying at exactly the same height, airspeed and all the rest, and once again closed the throttle with K. at the controls. He did as he had been shown – surplus airspeed into height, instrument check, correct gliding speed and S-turns towards the leeward side of the field we had chosen. He undershot by miles! No way could he have made it over the hedge of that particular landing spot.


‘Never mind.’ I told him. ‘Back up to the same spot and try again.’ He did, and again he undershot by the same margin as the last time. ‘Right’, I said, ‘Let me show you once more. And we climbed again to exactly the same altitude and the same location, I closed the throttle, and showed how easy it was to reach the field in the proper way. K. tried a third time. He undershot. ‘Let’s give it up for today,’ I said. ‘Things may be better tomorrow’. A subdued K. was a most attentive pupil for some time after that experience. So, how was it done? The Harvard has a variable pitch propeller, which means that the propeller blades can be turned so that their leading edges face more into the wind in ‘coarse’ pitch, and are flatter to the wind in ‘fine’ pitch. Take-offs are done in fine pitch, so that the engine can rotate the propeller


at maximum revolutions whilst forward speed is low, and cruising is achieved at coarser pitch as speed builds up. Fine pitch has to be selected by the pilot not only for take-off but for the last bit of the landing approach, so that if the engine has to be opened up suddenly to climb away and make another approach, the maximum revs on the engine are available for full power to be delivered to the propeller. However, on the gliding descent for a forced landing, it is essential to achieve the lowest rate of descent and the longest possible glide, so coarse pitch is chosen to present the least possible air resistance from the unpowered propeller. Just before the final landing approach, fine pitch must be selected before the throttle is opened to climb away again. What I had done was quite simple. K. had properly selected coarse pitch at the beginning of his descents. Unknown to him, I had then carefully pulled back the pitch control to ‘fine’, leaving it there until just before he would himself have selected ‘fine’ for the climb away. With pitch in fine from 2,000 feet down, K. had no chance whatsoever of duplicating the gliding descents I had made in coarse pitch. I never told him.


I have called this pupil ‘K’ for a good reason. Gwelo, with its white civil 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164