This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
68


insulation Turn down the volume


Adrian Pargeter of Kingspan Insulation describes how ‘lower lambda’ insulation can be the architect’s friend, as more efficiency means less volume is needed to achieve regulations compliance.


Masonry cavity walls remain the UK’s most popular house construction method, and can be used to achieve a wide range of design styles


PIR required 65 mm (0.022 W/m.K), phenolic required 60 mm (0.020 W/m.K),


and advanced phenolic


55 mm (0.018 W/m.K). Phenolic insulation cavity boards are widely used in UK


‘The most recent changes to the regulations significantly raised the insulation levels required; as a result the overall thickness of the external walls, and consequent footprint, can also increase considerably’


conventional cavity wall construction, tighter regulations could leave designers with a potential space problem. The most recent changes to the regulations (Approved


B


Documents L1A and L1B of Building Regulations 2013 in England and 2014 in Wales, and Section 6 2015 of the Building Standards in Scotland), significantly raised the levels of insulation required for a building to reach compliance. As a result, the overall thickness of the external walls, and consequently building footprint, could also increase considerably. If you are not able to increase the footprint size, or simply don’t


want to, then the only other alternative is to reduce the size of the internal space. This can lead to unsatisfactory compromises on the dimensions and layout of rooms, making them feel cramped and unwelcoming. Above and beyond these considerations, there is a practical


problem. Namely that most contractors simply do not like traditional masonry cavity wall constructions to be much wider than 300 mm. Larger cavities have other knock-on effects, such as the need for longer wall ties and bigger foundations, all of which can add to the time and cost of construction.


Slimming down


A typical cavity wall construction would be a 100 mm medium density concrete block inner leaf with a 100 mm brick outer leaf. That leaves just 100 mm void for the insulation and cavity. So how can designers meet the regulatory requirements and stay within those parameters? The first thing to look at is the thermal conductivity of the insulation to be used, i.e. its lambda value. The lower it is, the more efficient the insulation, so the thinner it needs to be to be to exceed the required U-value. The thicknesses required for commonly used insulation mate-


rials to achieve the same level of thermal performance vary con- siderably. To achieve a tested R-value of 2.857, mineral fibre required 110 mm (for a lambda value of 0.038 W/m.K), whereas


www.architectsdatafile.co.uk


uilding Regulations have recently become more demand- ing when it comes to insulating properties to achieve better U-values. If a building design relies on a


construction. They have a fibre-free core, and are designed to be unaffected by air infiltration and to be easy to handle, and offer excellent levels of thermal efficiency. Recent product innovations in advanced phenolic cavity boards have meant that reduced insulation thicknesses can now be achieved that deliver a desired U-value for the entire cavity wall construction. Boards can be combined with foil facings which are


well-suited to partial fill applications. Reflecting radiated heat back into a property, they can significantly increase the thermal resistance of the cavity and reduce the thickness of insulation required. However, facings still require a 50 mm clear cavity to be main-


tained, so a further development has been water-tight polypropy- lene fleece facings to protect against moisture ingress, allowing the air gap to be reduced to just 10 mm. The gap between the board and the outer facing can be simply maintained using a retaining clip which fastens to the wall ties, and a self-adhesive breather tape should be used to create a continuous water-tight facing. Combining such facings with advanced insulation materials


can significantly reduce whole wall construction thicknesses. Take the example of a traditional cavity walled construction with a 102.5 mm brick outer leaf and a 100 mm medium density block inner leaf (with a 6.6 per cent thermal bridging factor assumed for mortar joints). In this example a 90 mm thickness of lower-lambda phenolic


insulation, plus a 10 mm air gap, is all that is needed for a whole wall U-value of 0.18 W/m2


Performance, not compromise


In balancing the different demands of design, preferred construction and building performance, compromises sometimes have to be made. Is space more of an issue than energy efficiency? Will performance suffer at the hands of convenience? Straightforward solutions are however available that resolve the dilemmas, and allow designers to continue to employ the popular cavity wall construction approach whilst keeping walls slim and well insulated.


Adrian Pargeter is head of technical and product development Kingspan Insulation


enq.219 .K. This construction could be


applied to help meet Building Regulations and standards across the UK, including in Scotland where they are most stringent.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84