12
views
Garden views: a key role in Nash Baker’s work
Kensington and Chelsea is an engaging place for architects, with 35 conservation areas covering 70 per cent of the borough, and some 3,800 listed buildings. It represents a significant slice of England’s cultural and architectural history; a continual source of inspiration. I think most would agree that we have a responsibility to
preserve our unique historic environment; after all, it is a shared and finite resource we all benefit from on some level. The chal- lenge we frequently face as architects is to agree the most appro- priate method for preserving or adapting historic buildings, while creating properties which meet the needs of modern life.
That balance between contemporary design and conservation must make planning a challenge?
London planning officers are very professional and we like to initiate a dialogue with them as early as possible in the design process. Naturally we don't invite them to perform the role of a designer, but neither do I want nasty surprises for the client, so it is sensible for them to be involved throughout the process. Our ongoing success has, in part, been built upon this track record and many clients – particularly developers – come back to us because of our knowledge and experience of this area.
The practice can often be found working on old houses and fixing piecemeal alterations and extensions. How can such factors affect a project?
We are often confronted with historic alterations that were probably attempts to address the needs of their time. Unfortunately, these ad hoc alterations are often unsympa- thetic, poorly built and no longer fit for purpose. At Nash Baker we try to unravel the layers of historic alternations and assess what original fabric remains and its historic significance before we consider designing interventions. Church Farm, in Suffolk, had seen centuries of sub-division and alterations which needed rationalising in order to make it work today as a
www.architectsdatafile.co.uk
functioning family home, and it was a time consuming job – but the result is hugely rewarding.
Does offering a full architectural service help on the trickier projects?
Traditionally, architects have seen themselves as the conductor of an orchestra and we probably still think a bit like this. At Nash Baker, we like to be involved with all aspects of a project, even the less glamorous unseen parts, because we are interested in the process of creating buildings in their entirety. From our perspective, the success of a project lies as much in the detailing and the coordination of works as it does in the quality of the initial design concept. For our clients this also ensures the highest quality of finish and a more pleasant experience all round. We consider architecture as a job without limitations and enjoy taking a holistic approach to design.
What will be the next ‘big thing’ for the industry?
I am glad people are increasingly keen to use traditional vernacular materials, and have a healthy respect and appreciation for crafts- manship again. We have responded to that; a good example being our Broad Street House project which is up for a RIBA regional award. It was built using traditional materials including locally- sourced oak cladding and handmade bricks laid with lime mortar, although the house design itself is entirely contemporary.
How has the practice evolved, and what are your hopes for 2016?
Nash Baker has changed beyond recognition. When we started it was just myself and Howard Nash, the other director. Our first project was designing a staircase; we had to build up the business from scratch. As to the future, building a reputation takes time, and every project and referral counts, so delivering an excellent service to clients is paramount. We’re not necessarily focused on growth, more on constantly improving and honing what we do.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84