This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The team in the kitchen at the White Oak in Cookham, including chef patron Clive Dixon (centre). Dixon has been there since 2012


The emphasis is on working as a team C


live Dixon, chef patron of the White Oak at Cookham, has travelled a long and sometimes winding road through the higher echelons of modern British


cooking. Having started out at Lords of the Manor and then Hunstrete House, which both achieved Michelin stars, he has had a number of lead chef positions, including working with the legendary Pierre Koffmann at his epon- ymous restaurant in the Berkeley Hotel. He has been at the White Oak since 2012 and considers it one of the most satisfying businesses he has run. The


emphasis is very much on working as a team. From the front of house to KP, everything is focused on the food and every member of the team is fully briefed on the ingredients and dishes of


the day. Enthusiasm for what’s delivered on the plate is infectiously transferred to the guests and there’s a sense of excitement and anticipation that per- vades the White Oak style of hospitality. As Dixon says, “What gets me up in the morning is the search for the fresh- est and fi nest ingredients of the day.” He is also absolutely clear that while his skill and passion is cooking, the business he is in is hospitality. Having been to the White Oak several times this year, I can bear witness to the fact that his vision is delivered with pas- sion by every member of his team.


the food speak for itself’ seems very much the way forward.


Why it works better when it’s simpler If you talk to the chefs who are leading this trend, they will tell you that rely- ing less on presentation and focusing more on food quality and freshness is a more satisfying discipline. It is worth remembering that in Medieval times, the invention of many sauces was caused by the need to mask less than perfectly fresh food fl avours. The simplifi cation that is occurring in


many Michelin starred establishments is echoed throughout many less formal restaurants. It seems to me to be a satisfying trend both for the diner and for the team operating.


ISSUE 4 2014 © cybertrek 2014


And it makes business sense Anybody who’s in hospitality knows that the key cost factor and the key manage- ment stress is all to do with the staff. With the right team and everything working harmoniously, a restaurant positively beams with satisfaction and success. Too few staff and everything grinds to a halt. Too many for a par- ticular meal occasion and everything gets cluttered and clumsy. By focusing on simpler service and more straight- forward food, the need for extraneous staff and fussy activities is reduced.


In tune with the times


More and more restaurants in even the swankiest hotels have a very relaxed dress policy. Front-of-house


staff tend to be more informally attired and an attitude of all being one com- munity rather than ‘them and us’ is much more prevalent.


These are egalitarian times and food


service and restaurant presentation is fi tting in with the fashion.


Which brings me back to Marcus As I said at the beginning, I think even Marcus at the Berkeley is refl ecting this trend for a simpler way. The new res- taurant features a very much simpler style of greeting and front-of-house ser- vice. The food is also served plated up in a much simpler way. What hasn’t changed is the quality on the plate. Go there before they get bored and go back to being haughty! ●


Read Leisure Management online leisuremanagement.co.uk/digital 111


PHOTO: MARTIN WILSON


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116