This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
When lower-cost replacement parts are


used on braking systems, they may not meet the federally mandated stopping distances required for school buses, he cautioned. “School bus brakes are one of the most


highly engineered systems we make. In the secondary market, those same rules may not apply,” he added. In one case, a transportation director at


one Michigan school district reported that some buses were not stopping as well as before. Not so coincidentally, the shop had recently made brake repairs using replace- ment parts from a secondary manufacturer instead of the original equipment. “Lo and behold, we discovered the brake linings being used were not up to standards. Tey simply did not perform at the same


level as the original equipment,” Ganaway said. “Te transportation director was only able to find this when he proactively per- formed the stopping distance test.” Bus drivers and mechanics must also be


proactive when it comes to checking tires. According to Advantage PressurePro, tires that are not properly inflated can decrease a vehicle’s average mpg by more than 3 per- cent. Tire pressure monitoring systems such as theirs can improve shop efficiency with quicker, more complete tire inflation checks that take less time, freeing up maintenance staff for other projects.


FMCSA has stated that under-inflation is the primary reason tires fail. When tires are not inflated to manufacturer recommen- dations, it results in more sidewall flexing, or deflection, which consumes more energy and uses more fuel. “Facts like these are prevalent, and


continue to prove that maintaining optimal pressure is vital, not only to experience op- timal tire life but also vehicle performance,” said Vanessa Hargrave, director of market- ing at Advantage PressurePro. “Over- and under-inflated tires are also detrimental to stopping distances, handling, fuel economy, maintenance and more.” 


CONSTANT 20% UNDER- INFLATION = 30%


REDUCTION IN TIRE LIFE, 1% REDUCTION IN FUEL ECONOMY, 25% REDUCTION IN TREAD WEAR


56 School Transportation News March 2014


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76