News | CCTVImage CCTV in the Boston bombings


CCTV surveillance video played a crucial role in the investigation of the men who set off two bombs near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. According to a British video analyst who didn’t want to be identified, crowd-sourced images and investigations are the wave of the future.


A VIDEO forensics expert has been talking to SecurityNewsDesk about the use of CCTV footage in the investigation of the Boston marathon bombing. The analyst, who was commenting anony- mously, confirmed that releasing CCTV footage of the two suspects had clearly been instrumental in finding the two suspects, either because someone had recognised them or, more likely he said, the suspects realised that they would be identified soon and chose to come out of hiding.


There are reports that the two suspects robbed a convenience store shortly after their images were released to the media. “Whatever the reason, as soon as the FBI released the video footage, I knew that it was only a matter of time – perhaps a day or two at most – before they were identified,” he said.


The analyst, who is an expert in the use of the latest video forensic tools, was sceptical about claims made by producers of video


Analyst: CCTV has clearly been invaluable in Boston bombings


analytic software that they could have prevented the Boston bomb- ings by spotting the bombers before they struck. The former president


of Oncam Global, Dr James Ionson,


claimed in a TV interview in America that the technology to iden- tify suspicious behaviour already exists.


He said he was frustrated that it had not been widely adopted by police departments. And Face First CEO Joe Rosenkrantz, inter- viewed on Bloomberg TV, claimed that video analytics could be used to identify thousands of people from CCTV images against databases of known individuals. (see story below) Much has been said in the past week about the use of images from mobile phones and camcorders. The analyst said that while they have a role to play, he was keen to put them into perspective. “On a mass event like that, the management of that much video material would be a nightmare,” he said. “You would use CCTV in the first instance to establish the movements of people and the timeline of events and then use crowd-sourced images – both video and still images – to fill in the gaps.”


Amateur video and still images could provide a different angle on a person of interest, but they would be difficult to identify in


the mass of publicly-sourced material until you had gone through the process of establishing exactly where and when it was shot. He was critical of the video that the FBI released of the two suspects, commenting: “The FBI did it horrendously.” He pointed out the ghost images that appeared in the video


which are an example of frame blending, a video artefact which can result from converting time lapse video to play at higher speeds. “It’s easily fixed,” he said. “I’m surprised that they rushed it out this way – I assumed they were delaying the release of the video in order to get it right.”


From his knowledge of how video is used in investigations, he said that the FBI would have much more video which they hadn’t released. The process of analysing this would be made easier by the suspects’ distinctive headgear. Most likely one team of ana- lysts would look backward, working out where the suspects had come from while another would work forward to determine where they went after the bombings.


“Overall, this is a good case study for CCTV,” he concluded. “A camera sits there for years and years capturing almost nothing and then one day it helps us out.”


Former president of Oncam Global claims video analytics could have identifi ed the Boston bombers before they struck


THE FORMER president of Oncam Global, Dr James Ionson, has claimed that video ana- lytics could have prevented the bombings by detecting the bombers before they struck. In an interview with NECN.com, he said


that it’s frustrating to him that the technol- ogy exists to have prevented this before- hand, using cognitive systems that mimic the human brain.


And he added, the use of CCTV focuses too much on forensic analysis of events afterward and while it’s good news that the FBI is able to track the suspects down after the fact, he believes we need to invest in systems that would detect and prevent incidents like this beforehand. Another company has added their voice to the discussion. Face First CEO Joe


Spring 2013 12


Rosenkrantz was interviewed on Bloomberg TV and claimed that video analytics could be used to identify thousands of people from CCTV images against databases of known individuals.


You can watch videos of these two inter- views by going to SecurityNewsDesk.com and searching for “Oncam Global claims video analytics”.


Issue sponsor www.securitynewsdesk.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36