This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TECHNICAL UPDATE


has deliberated over whether or not it can ban them. Prior to the German Grand Prix in July, the FIA’s Chief technical delegate, Charlie Whiting, answered questions on the FIA’s stance on the matter.


Blown diffusers B


Why the FIA should decide against exhaust-driven floors


lown diffusers have been a hot topic in Formula 1 since the Spanish Grand Prix, and the FIA


maps created with the primary objective of improving the aerodynamic performance of the car. Prior to that it had been assumed that any aerodynamic benefits were incidental to the primary purpose of the engine and its exhausts ie that of generating torque.


Was the investigation initiated by the FIA or did it come from an F1 team? The matter was initiated by the FIA when facts concerning some quite extreme, and hitherto unseen, engine mapping began to emerge. We were concerned that exhaust tailpipes were being positioned and engine


Why did you decide to act? Because not only did we consider such extreme mapping to be arguably illegal but also, if such freedom was left unchecked, it would result in the teams incurring significant further development costs during the course of the season.


Is the off-throttle blown diffuser illegal under the 2011 technical regulations?


We certainly consider them to be questionable. However, the key is whether or not we consider any particular engine map to have been created for any other reason than the generation of engine torque.


Is its illegality an unforeseen side effect of the rule to ban f-ducts? No, the two are unconnected.


Why was it not possible to simply introduce blanket limits on hot and cold blowing and apply them equally to every car? This is precisely what we attempted to do in the first communication to the teams on 12 May. However, it soon became apparent that the matter


was more complex than initially thought. The main problem was the difficulty in ensuring that teams were not prevented from using existing legitimate strategies, whilst ensuring that the extreme mapping was no longer possible. This is why we postponed the introduction of the measures until the British Grand Prix. There are also a number of other mechanical factors to take into account, such as the architecture of the engine throttles themselves (butterfly or barrel operation).


What measures were introduced for the European Grand Prix in Valencia? Whilst examining the engine maps from several teams it became clear that extreme


Renault’s R31 exploited the hot blown floor concept in the most extreme way, with its exhaust exits at the front of the sidepods 88 www.racecar-engineering.com • September 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100