This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FORMULA STUDENT


One of the few teams to fully exploit the potential benefits of aerodynamics, GFR turned up with an elaborate front and rear wing set up


example, whose team leader argued that ‘we think at our speed aerodynamics are useless, so we didn’t do any studies into downforce generation.’ Instead, the team chose to focus on electronics: ‘We have a complete self-made electronic control unit, which we programmed by ourselves. It’s been hard work but the results are very interesting because we can change everything.’ With so many varied methods,


Convinced by CFD and lap time simulation work of its benefits, the GFR entry also had this downforce-generating underbody


attitudes and design philosophies on show, there seems to be no one technique to achieving the fastest car. However, experience is essential, and one man who has plenty is Formula Student


CAR FOCUS - CTU CARTECH FS.03


CTU CarTech from the Czech Technical University


in Prague entered the competition for the third year in 2011, running its brand new car, FS.03.


‘On the previous car we had some problems with understeer, oversteer and suspension geometry, so this year we aimed to have a better suspension. We also wanted stiff parts, so we re-designed the uprights. On the rear suspension we lowered the weight with the integration of the rear driveshafts into the wheel hubs, which are made from chromium steel and have about 50 Rockwell hardness. We also bought better dampers, which weigh 700g including springs. This is a big difference


to our previous car, where the dampers weighed about 1.7kg. So by changing just one part, we saved 4kg.’ The car’s interesting design was based around things found in nature and developed using Autodesk software, while the engine is a 2009 Yamaha YZF-R6, to which the team added a new air box, cooling system and exhaust. ‘From our experience in Germany, where the track was quite technical, we tried to have maximum torque and power in lower engine revolutions, about 9,000 or 10,000rpm. Therefore, we have longer pipes on the air box and exhaust, which gives us better acceleration through corners.’ The car body weighs about 8kg and is made from carbon fibre.


patron, Ross Brawn. He believes that to make a


successful Formula Student car ‘you need to understand the regulations thoroughly. You need to know what it is you’re trying to achieve, and then understand the resources you have available in terms of setting the engineering tasks. It’s no good designing a fantastically complex engineering solution if you don’t have the resources… in terms of performance, getting weight down is one of the strongest factors you can apply to the performance of the vehicle, but obviously doing that without compromise is the key.


Most of the development work in the CTU FS.03 went into improving the suspension, using Autodesk software to draw up the new designs


At the start of the event, the team admitted it was nervous about the forecasted wet weather: ‘We tested only one week and raced about 170km in dry conditions, so the wet


will be a little tricky.’ A little tricky it may have been, but the hard work paid off and the team achieved an incredible top 10 finish, which was a vast improvement on last year’s 35th.


September 2011 • www.racecar-engineering.com 61


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100