pennings policy MidAmerica Farm Publications
19 N. Main, Perryville, MO 63775
www.mafg.net
573-547-2244 • FAX 573-547-5663 The MidAmerica
Farmer Grower
(ISSN 1040-1423) is published weekly by MidAmer- ica Farm Publications, Inc., 19 N. Main, Perryville, MO 63775. Periodical postage is paid at Cape Girardeau, MO 63701.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Circu- lation Manager, MidAmerica Farmer Grower, P.O. Box 323, Perryville, MO 63775.
PUBLISHER / EDITOR: John LaRose
publisher@mafg.net
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR: Barb Galeski
editor@mafg.net
SENIOR STAFF WRITER: Betty Valle Gegg-Naeger
editor@mafg.net
ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Regina LaRose
REPORTER / PHOTOGRAPHER: John LaRose, Jr.
GRAPHIC / WEB / PRODUCTION MANAGER: Renee Zahner
production@mafg.net
(573) 547-2244 FAX (573) 547-5663
ADVERTISEMENT CONTACTS
advertising@mafg.net Sales Manager Jack Thompson (573) 547-2244
jthompson@mafg.net
Livestock & Regional Account Executive Julie Huber (573) 547-2244
jhuber@mafg.net
Missouri & Illinois Lanny Copeland (618) 339-3232
Kentucky, Tennessee Bill Denman (731) 538-9121 Fax (573) 547-5663
Customer Service Robin Moll & Sarah Callier
info@mafg.net (573) 547-2244
NOTICE TO PAID SUBSCRIBERS: NO FREE CLASSIFIEDS ARE ACCEPTED BY TELEPHONE
REGULAR SUBSCRIPTION COST FOR: AR, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MO, MS, OK, TN, TX
2 yrs. (104 issues) $66.00 3 yrs. (156 issues) $90.00
Outside of the United States $120.00 CALL FOR DISCOUNTED PROMOTIONS
REGULAR SUBSCRIPTION COST FOR ALL OTHER STATES: 1 yr. (52 issues) $48.00 2 yrs. (104 issues) $72.00 3 yrs. (156 issues) $88.00 MAIL SUBSCRIPTION TO: Subscription MidAmerica Farmer Grower P.O. Box 323 Perryville, MO 63775
2• MidAmerica Farmer Grower / October 21, 2011 1 yr. (52 issues) $38.00
NCGA Proposes ACRE Modifications For 2012 Farm Bill
Bill was the Nation Corn Growers As- sociation (NCGA) with its Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program. While it was able to sell its program to Congress, it was less successful with farm- ers and landlords. Only 13 percent of total base acres were enrolled in the ACRE program. In “A New Farm Pro-
O
gram Option: Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE),”
Shields, Analyst
Dennis in
ne of the farm groups that was able to get its policy concept in- corporated into the 2008 Farm
To eliminate potential duplication of payments
with crop insurance the maximum payment is
5-year average revenue. This average is calculated using a state Crop Report- ing District (CRD) trigger based on the crop insurance harvest price for the CRD. The use of the CRD for making the benchmark calculation is a com- promise between ACRE’s use of state- level numbers and the desire of farmers to use county level numbers. Farmers pre- fer the smaller area be- cause of
the wide
reduced from 25 percent under ACRE to
10 percent under ADAP.
Agricultural Policy for the Congressional Re- search Service summarizes ACRE as follows: “The ACRE program pays a farmer when two conditions are met: (1) state-level revenue for a crop falls below a guaranteed level, and (2) the farmer experiences an individual crop revenue loss. (Payments for each crop are calculated separately.) If farmers select ACRE, they forgo 20 percent of their direct payments under the Direct and Counter-cyclical Payment Program (DCP), and commodity loan rates under the Marketing Assistance Loan Pro- gram are reduced by 30 percent. Also, ACRE participants are not eligible for counter-cyclical program payments under DCP.... “Once a farm is enrolled in ACRE, the
program applies to all eligible crops on that farm. A farmer who operates more than one farm may elect to enroll one or all of the farms in ACRE. Impor- tantly, once a farm is enrolled in ACRE, it must remain in the program for sub- sequent crop years (the program covers crop years 2009 through 2012).” The reductions in Direct Payments
and Loan Rates and the multi-year commitment were likely stumbling blocks to ACRE enrollment for many producers. For the 2012 Farm Bill, the NCGA is
proposing a modification of ACRE that they call the Agriculture Disaster As- sistance Program (ADAP). The new pro- gram takes into account not only the criticisms of ACRE, but also the lower funding levels that are being bandied about as a part of the deficit reduction program that Congress has imposed on itself. “Agriculture is prepared to take a proportionate and equitable share of budget cuts provided that everything is on the table,” the NCGA said in a press release
loads/useruploads/adap_summary_9- 9-11.pdf). ADAP calls for the elimination of the
Counter-Cyclical Payment Program. In addition, it calls for a 30 percent re- duction in Direct Payments. This re- duction would provide $15 billion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years. ADAP sets a benchmark based on a
variation in average yields (and thus rev- enue) from one part of a state to another. The maximum cover-
age of benchmark rev- enue is increased from 90 percent under
ACRE to 95 percent under ADAP. To eliminate potential duplication of pay- ments with crop insurance the maxi- mum payment is reduced from 25 percent under ACRE to 10 percent under ADAP. Under ACRE the program guarantee could not change by more
than 10 percent per year. The 10 percent limit is e l i m i n a t e d under ADAP. To date, ACRE
has found more support among corn farmers than producers of other crops, particularly cot- ton. Because cotton has a higher Direct Payment level than other crops, cotton farmers felt that ACRE did not offer enough protection for them to join the program.
Research Assistant Professor at APAC, University of Tennessee
DR. HARWOOD D. SCHAFFER
∆ DR. DARYLL E. RAY: Blasingame
Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Pol- icy, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee DR. HARWOOD D. SCHAFFER: Re-
search Assistant Professor at APAC, University of Tennessee
DR. DARYLL E. RAY Agricultural Economist University of Tennessee
∆ Contact Dr. Daryll E. Ray or Dr. Harwood D. Schaffer at the UTʼs Agricultural Policy Analysis Center by calling (865) 974-7407,faxing (865) 974-7298, or emailing
dray@utk.edu or
hdschaffer@utk.edu For more info, visit:
www.agpolicy.org
(
http://www.ncga.com/up-
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40