This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Effective Presentation of Damages 25 Helpful Strategies to Implement Right Now by Larry Kaye


As litigators, our goal is to win cases.


But the sweetest liability verdict sours quickly when a damage award is too low. Here is a list of things that you can and should do to increase your chances of higher damage awards that will hold up after trial.


1. Do choose your cases carefully. Al- though this seems like an obvious point, many attorneys do less than a stellar job when it comes to selecting cases. If you want to maximize your damages at trial, start by choosing only cases that you would bring to trial – not merely ones that you feel might allow you to force a settlement. Those “settlement forcers” have a way of becoming the dog cases that will often not settle and lead to defense verdicts. In selecting cases, do a rigorous assessment of the plaintiff ’s case, including a thorough examina- tion of damages and the theory behind them.


2. Do make sure your client will be “worthy” of receiving damages in the eyes of a jury. This means that the cli- ent is credible and genuinely interested in recovering from injury. It means that the client is actually looking for work – if the case involves a termination. It means that the client is not merely litigious, but genuinely injured. It means that the jury will embrace your damage claim and will want to award damages, and not begrudgingly.


3. Do provide a detailed damages questionnaire to your clients, and take a thorough damages history. At the outset of the case, provide a detailed damages questionnaire to your client to complete for you, and take a thorough damages history to ensure you know every possible type of damages your client has suffered. Focus on tangible in- formation from your client to enable you to make that assessment. For instance,


1 Deposition = 1 Montblanc Pen You Book The


Depo, We’ll Bring The Sword


Why would Capital Reporting Company give a Montblanc pen to your firm? It’s simple - we are confident that your first depo with Capital will not be your last! Besides, 1st class companies don't give out pens and magnets!


(410) 685 - DEPO (301) 345 - DEPO Offices throughout MD, DC, VA & PA www.CapitalReportingCompany.com


We Never Take Your Business For Granted!


To receive your pen: (i) deposition must be at least 3 hours, (ii) attorney must personally receive pen on behalf of firm, (iii) transcript charge must be paid in full, (iv) the booking attorney must be a new client, and (v) deposition must be booked before 12/31/08. Limit one pen per new client. Prior to running any promotion, Capital reviews the applicable rules of professional conduct and ethics opinions to make sure that our “giveaways” are appropriate. See Rule 1.8 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.


Sponsor


MTLA Silver


6 Trial Reporter


specific questions about sleep patterns, actual symptoms, episodes of crying and/or thoughts of despair − these are often more helpful than simply asking the client to explain how they have been affected by the defendant’s conduct. Expand this list so you are sure to have asked every question to uncover the information you need. Once you have the information, you can then determine the best way to present it.


4. Don’t devote extensive time in your opening statement to a discussion of damages. When the jurors have not heard the evidence, it will generally be hard to win them over on the issue of damages. Instead, let them know that you will be asking them to “direct that the defendant compensate the plaintiff” for his or her injuries. This gets the jurors away from the concept of think- ing that the damages are a “prize” to be “awarded,” and helps portray damages as just compensation for injury.


5. Don’t listen to the self-fulfilling prophecy about the “conservative jury.” When I was a new attorney in Montgom- ery County, I heard colleagues tell me about how conservative Montgomery County or Maryland federal juries tend- ed to award less damages. Judges told me this as well, usually as a settlement tool. But oftentimes, these pessimistic state- ments become a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy, leading attorneys to give their damages cases short shrift. In fact, actual experience in Montgomery County and in federal court has been quite the oppo- site of the gloom-and-doom predictions that I heard. Prepare every damage case without regard to whether or not a jury will be “conservative.” Give those


(Continued on page 8) Spring 2008


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66