This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Case # Case Name Jeffrey G. Bennett 237-2784-02 WSSC v Mark E. Riley, et al.


Counsel for Appellant Area of Law


236-2705-02 Samsun Corporation t/a Ami C. Dwyer, Singer Exxon v


Ben Bialek, (301) 206-7096


Vacating an Enrolled Settlement/Judgment


238-2810-02 Steven D. Bryant v Steven D. Bryant, pro se, Thomas B. Ducker, M.D. (301) 855-4583


Medical Malpractice/ Appeal of Motion for Summary Judgment


239-2820-02 Diane M. Johnson, et al. Gilbert A. Hoffman, v Baltimore County


(410) 252-5737


Local Gov’t Tort Claims/ Notice Provision


240-2841-02 Samuel Smith v Town of Veronice A. Holt, Morningside and


(202) 237-8870 Officer Mark Marshall


Constitutional/ Common Law Torts


241-2886-02 Dushko S. Zdravkovich v Ralph W. Powers, Jr., Shoppers Food Warehouse (301) 627-5400


Slip and Fall/ Directed Verdict


242-0014-03 Reginald L. Robinson v Michael C. Worsham, Martin/Prince Prophecy Homeowners


(410) 557-6192


Association, Inc., et al. MD Debt Collection Act and Attorneys’ Fees


243-??-03


Tawan Patrick v Eric Gordon


Lawrence Eiser, (301) 587-7080


Motor Vehicle/Mistrial


Hotten, Prince George’s County


George’s County


Dawson/Prince George’s County


Shepherd/Prince George’s County


Cox/Baltimore County


Silkworth/Anne Arundel County


(410) 752-8700


Slip and Fall/ Evidentiary Rulings


Smith/Prince George’s County


Judge Jurisdiction


Baldwin/Harford County


Issues


Did the trial court err in denying Defendant’s Motion in Limine and allowing Plaintiff’s orthopedic witness to tes- tify that the Plaintiff ’s erectile dysfunction was causally related to his lower back injury following which the jury awarded $111,662.50?


Did the trial court err in reopening a case following an order dismissing the case with prejudice subject to the “right of a party to move for good cause shown within 30 days to reopen this action, if settlement is not consummated,” Plain- tiff, after 30 days, filed its motion to set aside the settlement on the issue of whether his attorneys were authorized to enter into it?


Did the trial court err in granting Summary Judgment not- withstanding expert testimony presented by the Plaintiff with respect to the Defendant’s use of a new FDA-approved medical procedure, i.e. a BAK fusion system for his spinal fusion?


Did the appellant substantially comply with the 180-day notice to county requirement and, was the county preju- diced by the delay?


Did the trial court err in directing a verdict on behalf of the municipality with respect to the allegations brought against it on the grounds that the Plaintiff had not shown the req- uisite degree of malice?


Did the trial court err in ruling that the Defendant Shop- pers Food Warehouse had no legal responsibility for the dangerous condition directly adjacent to its store as main- tenance of the parking area was the shopping center’s responsibility under the lease?


Did the trial court err in failing to award attorneys’ fees or costs after a successful jury trial where damages were awarded under the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act and in not requiring the production of attorney time and bill- ing records by Defendants’ counsel?


Did the trial court err in not granting a mistrial requested when Defense counsel Michael DeSantis erroneously al- leged during cross-examination of the Plaintiff that she had a prior felony theft conviction? The Motion for Mistrial was again sought when the jury returned a Defendant’s ver- dict on this dump truck rear-end accident with $26,000 in medical expenses and over $6,000 in loss of income with permanent injury.


Copies of any of the appellants’ briefs cited in this article are available to members for $20 each. Please be sure to note the Case # as shown in the “Appellate Watch” table.


 


     


 


34


 


    


 Trial Reporter


Fall 2003


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52