Case # Case Name 5519
Counsel for Appellant Area of Law
Bernetha George v.
Monumental Life Insurance Company, et al.
5833 6211
Carolyn Barnard v. State Retirement & Pension System of Maryland
Frank Collins 410-659-5599
Judge Jurisdiction
Brennan/Baltimore County
Thomas Dabney 301-334-9444 Sherbin/Garrett Domestic Relations
County
American Bio Medica Corp. Charles Michael Tobin v. Medical Diagnostics, Inc. 202-835-8100
Award of Trustees Fees 6766
Casula/ Prince George’s County
Issues
In this case for life insurance disability benefits, did the cir- cuit court abuse its discretion in denying a Motion for New Trial asserting, with affidavits, that a juror’s spouse had the same medical condition as appellant (mitral valve prolapse) and failed to respond during the voir dire examination?
Did ERS breach a legal duty owed to appellant/widow when, upon the death of her husband, ERS failed to notify her of proposed payments of death benefits and other rights.
As a result of an ancillary proceeding, did the trial court err in ordering appellant to transfer 6 million shares of stock to the Estate of Robert Friedenberg and that the trustee (Eric F. Rosenberg) be paid a commission of 2% of the value of the total stock, which was calculated to be worth $21 mil- lion. Appellant alleges that the $400,000 trustee fee is without legal justification and unconscionable.
Jones v. Mid-Atlantic Funding Co. et al.
168569 Teddy Ngozika v.
Saul Kerpelman 410-547-0202 Byrnes/Baltimore Lead Paint
City John Iweanoge 202-347-7026 Linda Leber, Personal Rep. Motor Vehicle Ferretti/
Montgomery County
Did the trial court err in granting a motion for summary judgment ruling as a matter of law that the defendant prop- erty owners did not have adequate notice of a hazardous lead paint condition on the premises?
Where the defendant fails to yield the right-of-way and en- ters a favored highway and where by defense counsel’s admission in open court plaintiff was not negligent, did the trial court err in failing to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff? Additionally, did the trial court err when it was presented with the jury question, “Must there always be a negligent party?” and it answered “No.” over objection (The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.)
Winter 2000
Trial Reporter
37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48