to visualise than clip. Clip Rate: 0.15” clip at 6 mph = 0.9”
Cuts per metre: 22mm per cut at 9km/h (6mph) = 45 cuts per metre
the recommended 20% margin, and the additional blades will cause more air turbulence. There will be more chance that the 10-bladed cylinder will fan the grass, causing it to not stand up for a clean cut.
Example 2
The cutting action of a cylinder mower results in cut grass that has small waves in it. At higher cutting frequencies, these are too fine to see. They can, however, be seen on units with lower frequencies, (meaning larger gaps between each successive cut). The FOC can be described as the distance
between the valleys of two successive waves. FOC is determined by the number of blades per cylinder, the cylinder speed (RPM) and the forward speed of the mower. As the mower travels forward, the bottom blade pushes against the grass in front of it. At the same time, the cylinder blade is gathering grass as it moves toward the bottom blade. The opposing forces gather the grass blades together at the shear point, and the result is a singular wave-like profile on the cut grass. As the mower continues to move forward, the cutting process continues for each successive cylinder blade as it passes over the bottom blade.
A cylinder unit is properly matched to the application when the FOC is approximately equal to the height of cut. The lower the height of cut, the more blades a cylinder will contain to match the correct FOC.
Frequency of Cut Too High
When a cutting unit is put into an application with an FOC greater than the height of cut, the waves that were invisible to the eye with the correct FOC are now visible. This is known as ‘ribbing’ in Europe or ‘marcelling’ in the US. The most common cause of ribbing or marcelling is driving the mower too fast over an area. This leaves a very noticeable short, choppy wave pattern.
fixed by the design of the cutting unit. A particular cutting unit, however, may offer cylinder options for the number of cylinder blades desired. The number of blades is one of the factors in determining the FOC. Finally, let’s have a look at some theoretical applications
Application
As we can now appreciate, the number of blades in the cylinder, rotational speed of the cylinder, and mower ground speed determine FOC. The lower the FOC, the smoother the cut. In application, a 5-blade cylinder turning at
1200 rpm would provide enough clip rate for roughs, while an 11-blade cylinder turning at 2000 rpm might be required for greens on a golf course. When a customer is considering the correct cylinder for the application, it is important to check the manufacturer’s stated FOC. A good rule of thumb to use is that the FOC should be within 20% of the height of cut.
Example 1
Green Acres Golf Course wants to purchase a trim mower. The unit can be purchased with 5, 7 or 10-bladed cutting units. Which cutting unit should the customer purchase? The first question to ask the customer is; What is your preferred height of cut? The customer replies that it will be 19mm. Now, look at the manufacturer’s
specifications on FOC. In this example it states:
Hometown School wants to buy the same type of mower to use on its sports pitches. The customer’s height of cut will be 30mm. The specification literature states the height of cut range for this mower is 12–47mm. Our numbers showed us that the best cylinder to use for this application would be the 5-bladed cutting unit. The FOC for the 5-blade is 25.33mm at the 9.5km/h mow speed, again, this is a good match for the 30mm height of cut.
Calculating Frequency of Cut
Example: Trim mower with 9.5km/h (6mph) mowing speed, cylinders turning at 1,250rpm, and a choice of 5, 7 or 11-blade cylinders.
Speed: 1km/h = 1,000 metres/hour / 60 = 16.667 metres/min.
16.667 metres/min X 1,000 = 16,666.67mm/min @ 1km/h (This is a constant).
So, 16,666.67mm/min x 9.5(km/h) = 158,330mm/min.
blade x 1250 rpm = 6,250 cuts/min. 158,330mm/min / 6,250 cuts = 25.33mm.
5-b
1,000mm / 25.33 = 39.47 cuts per metre. 25.33 / 9.5km/h = 2.66mm/km/h clip.
blade x 1250rpm = 8,750 cuts/min. 158,330mm/min / 8,750 cuts =18.09mm.
7-b
1,000mm / 18.09 = 55.23 cuts per metre. 18.09 / 9.5km/h = 1.9mm/km/h clip.
blade x 1250rpm = 13,750 cuts/min. 158,330mm/min / 13,750 cuts = 11.51mm.
11-b
1,000mm / 11.51 = 86.88 cuts per metre. 11.51 / 9.5km/k = 1.2mm/km/h clip.
In all the above calculations, the cylinder speed and number of knives give the cuts per minute. Then, calculating the forward speed in mm/minute, allows a simple division to arrive at a clip rate in millimetres. Dividing this into a metre gives the easy to visualise measurement in cuts per metre.
Although this looks relatively complex, once Frequency of Clip and Ball Speed
In the golf environment, when the FOC is equal to or less than the height of cut, the wave-like profile of the grass is minimal and the smoothness of the turf surface allows faster ball speed. When the FOC is greater than the height of cut, the wave pattern is larger and the surface is not as smooth, so ball speed is slower. A greater distance between clips is also more susceptible to stragglers than a shorter distance between clips. Stragglers further slow ball speed.
Cylinder configurations vary by diameter, cutting width, and the number of blades. The cylinder diameter and cutting width are usually
125
It is important to note that manufacturers are not consistent in stating their FOC in relation to mowing speed. Some manufacturers give the figure at a stated mowing speed, while others do not. It is therefore necessary to return to the specification sheet and confirm what the mow speed is. Others may quote the cuts per metre (usually at the full mowing speed), as this is how most machines are actually used. In this example, the specification sheet (see table below) stated that the unit can mow up to 9.5km/h (6mph). By multiplying the FOC by the forward speed, we can find the actual FOC for any given speed.
Since the desired height of cut is 19mm, we
need to have the FOC within 20% of this number. The 7-bladed cylinder has a near perfect FOC of 18.09mm, which satisfies the within 20% rule. The FOC for the 10-bladed cylinder is out of
you have done a couple of calculations, you soon get the hang of it. However, I hope the most valuable take-away from this article has been to explain the importance of frequency of cut and how it affects consistent ball speed. A lower frequency of cut produces a smoother surface and better ball roll. If you can add to that consistency of cut, it is possible to achieve consistency across all greens.
Jacobsen Eclipse Greens Mowers
In this article we have discussed the importance of frequency of cut at some length. The latest development in mowing technology has been the ability to change the FOC, and then maintain it at a fixed rate, regardless of the forward speed of the machine.
This has been achieved by using electric motors for both cylinders and transmission, and linking them via a controller. The controller then adjusts the cylinder speed to match the forward speed of the machine.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148