FEATURE TRACKING & TRACEABILITY
FEEDING FOR CODING: One size doesn’t fit all
Behind every great off-line coder is a great feeding system. Richard Pether, director at designer and manufacturer of offline advanced feeding and coding systems, Rotech, examines how choosing the right feeding technology can optimise coding performance
FACT OR FRICTION? On the friction feeder, a gating finger sits on a feed roller in such a way that when the rollers turn, the bottom pack from the stack is fed forward. This means there is plenty of flexibility on what can be fed. This system works on something as thin as an 80gsm sheet of paper, right up to a folding carton made from thick board - as long as the substrate has a degree of stiffness so that it can be held in the stack. A plastic bag, for example, will collapse around the finger and would not be suitable for feeding via this method. Blister cards, cartons, seed packs, pouches and Tyvek lids are all well suited to friction feeding. One application where the friction feeder really comes into its own is when printing along the body of a carton using inkjet (inkjet only prints in the direction of travel), as the cartons can be fed flaps leading on a friction feeder.
W
hen buying a new off-line coding system, choosing the printer is
usually where the attention is focused, while working out how the pack will be fed to that coder becomes an afterthought. Yet the design of the feeding system is crucial to efficient, reliable and accurate code placement - a poorly designed or unsuitable feeder will result in frequent jams, misplaced codes, and the inability to code certain pack formats and styles altogether. All too often, coding equipment
suppliers and integrators take a ‘one size fits all’ approach to off-line feeding and will tell customers that one type of feeder - usually the friction feeder - can be used for any off-line coding application. It is true that the friction feeder is the most versatile type of feeder, but like any feeder, there are applications in which it excels and applications in which an alternative feeder design might prove more efficient.
32 SEPTEMBER 2016 | AUTOMATION
The shuttle feeder uses a high speed shuttle plate to steer the bottom
carton from the stack and deliver it onto a transport conveyor
The vaccum feeder – for difficult to feed products
SHUTTLE LAUNCH Rotech has taken the friction feeding concept to the next level with the shuttle feeder. This is specifically geared towards the pharmaceutical industry, where performance is key and small pack sizes are common. This type of feeder uses a high-speed shuttle plate to steer the bottom carton/sleeve from the stack and deliver it onto a transport conveyor. With friction feeders, the size of carton or wallet that can be fed is limited by the distance between the two sets of rollers, whereas shuttle feeders are fully adjustable. The plate can be easily changed to accommodate different pack sizes and thicknesses, allowing users to switch between cartons of varying dimensions, including very small packs. A shuttle feeder is also preferable for Braille packs, as the friction method might cause the pack to drag or twist, affecting reliability.
PICKING AND PLACING PROBLEM PACKS The third category of feeding system is the ‘pick and place’ or ‘vacuum’ feeder.
Packs are picked from the stack using a set of vacuum suction cups, then placed on an integral conveyor where they can be printed and labelled prior to being stacked again. This system is generally the best option for ‘difficult to feed’ products that can’t be denested from the bottom of a stack. Potential applications include polybags, crashlock cartons, resealable pouches, or doypacks and asymmetric products. With the rise of pouches, vacuum feeding is becoming more and more popular. When used in conjunction with a thermal transfer printer, this feeding technology is ideal for companies looking to overprint large amounts of variable information on pouches efficiently and cost-effectively.
CONVEYOR CONSIDERATIONS The conveyor is another element of a near-line coding system that is seldom given the consideration it deserves, given that it serves as both pack transporter and printer platform. Some systems use vacuum belts to transport packs from one stack to the other, but these are costly and complex. A universal belt conveyor is easier to operate and maintain, and can accommodate any printer, labeller or inspection system.
IF YOU CAN CODE IT, WE CAN FEED IT Rotech, a Hertfordshire-based specialist in designing feeding systems for coding, believes firmly in the ‘one size doesn’t fit all’ approach. The company has developed various methods of feeding and the overprinting systems in the company’s RF1 range can, between them, feed pretty much any pack format, from blister cards to pouches, cartons, polybags and sleeves. If there isn’t an existing technology to meet the needs of a specific sector or application, Rotech will develop one, evidenced by the recent launch of its RF-Lite entry level sleeve coding solution.
Rotech T: 01707 393700
www.rotechmachines.com
/AUTOMATION
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60