This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Communications/Telemetry


Data replication ensures optimum quality of service all the way to the edge of the enterprise where connectivity is intermittent or limited, says Steve Driver.


La replicación de datos garantiza una óptima calidad de servicio que se extiende hasta el extremo de la empresa donde la conectividad es intermitente o limitada, declara Steve Driver.


Durch Datenreplikation wird eine optimale Dienstgüte bis in die äußersten Unternehmensbereiche gewährleistet, wo die Verbindung unterbrochen oder beschränkt ist, so Steve Driver.


Overcoming the challenge of poor internet connectivity at remote sites


G


Fig. 1. Oil and Gas companies encounter issues when attempting to keep remote sites or workers up to date with essential data.


eographic remoteness and poor connectivity mean many oil and gas organisations encounter issues when attempting to


keep remote sites or workers up-to-date with essential data. Te problem of inconsistent connectivity and limited bandwidth is compounded by the trend towards ever- more distributed enterprises. Te growing number of mobile workers and remote sites spanning home, branch, regional and international offices, has meant the centralised architectures employed by most business applications today are out of sync with the distributed enterprise. Latency is a major source of frustration for users of remote applications. Network outages and connectivity issues aside, the fact that an application must communicate via a network during its operation introduces noticeable delays in processing and usability – even over high-speed networks. Te effect becomes more pronounced as the distance between


the user and the data centre increases. Where organisations are attempting


to run applications locally at remote sites that use large database systems such as Microsoft SQL, Oracle, or IBM DB2 at head office, it can be almost impossible to achieve the level of quality of service (QoS) required to keep the local instance (the slave) in sync with the central database (the master). Tis is why a fundamental change in the way business applications are architected is required by users such as oil and gas operators. Tere are several ways in which to


provide improved access to applications and data. Te first step is to recognise the internet’s inability to provide reliable access, and change its role in the application architecture from ‘mission- critical backbone’ to ‘occasionally needed service’. Based on this approach, there are four core technology options:


l N-Tier Client Server – closest to the traditional, in-house, centralised application environment, this scenario involves a central database server and deployment of robust client applications at each remote site or user location. Network connectivity is essential, with performance tied to available bandwidth and reliability


hinging on network availability; l Tin Client ‘Application Access Portals’ – a remote control operation where network dependant terminals access one or more central servers. Each user has their own virtual machines running on these central servers, on which the applications are loaded and executed. Regardless of bandwidth requirements, network connectivity is necessary to use the application. Latency may be an issue as keystroke and GUI data must be sent


between the thin client and the server; l Web Client – encompasses several


www.engineerlive.com 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84