This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Exploration • Drilling • Field Services


level in the tank is kept above the top of the pipe plate of the steam generator, and because the tank and the heat exchanger function as communicating vessels the pipes are filled with water. Te water in the pipes evaporates due to the heat supplied by the hot medium, so that the weight of the water column in the pipes reduces, causing it to rise. Te mixture of steam and water flows into the separation tank, the water flows downward and the steam flows out through a connection at the top of the tank.


promoters in the pipes somewhat eases this problem – but not enough to make it a viable solution for the factory. Falling film evaporation was the final solution


explored. Tis creates a situation in which no liquid level is maintained over the bundle and no boiling suppression can take place. It also involves a vertical heat exchanger with evaporating water in the pipes. Tis condensate flows downward from the top of the pipes as a thin film. On the way down, part of the water evaporates and is led upward as steam. Due to the thin water film, the heat transfer coefficient to the water is very high. Te non- evaporated water exits the pipes at the bottom and falls into the bottom tank. A fixed water level is maintained in the tank; this level controls the supply of fresh condensate. From this bottom tank, excess water is led to the top of the pipe plate, where a special header ensures that every pipe is supplied with sufficient water and that this water is evenly distributed over the pipe wall.


Te solution is a perfect example of simplicity


Fig. 3. The Thermosyphon reboiler is a vertical heat exchanger that was under consideration for the factory project.


Te problem with this principle in this situation is ‘boiling point suppression’. For example, take an evaporation temperature of 84°C with a corresponding evaporation pressure of 0.556bar. Te vertical pipe length is 6m. Tis 6m of extra water column produces a pressure at the bottom of the pipes of approx. 1.156bar, with a corresponding evaporation temperature of 113°C! As a consequence, the water does not boil in a large part of the pipes, but only though a low heat transfer coefficient. Tis adverse boiling suppression gives rise to a far from optimal heat transfer process. Te second solution assessed was a Kettle type


reboiler. Te advantage of this approach is that no individual separation tank is necessary. Te shell has a much larger diameter than the bundle, creating an area of steam above the bundle with natural separation of steam and water. Te horizontal body includes a water level that is maintained at a few centimetres above the pipe bundle. Here, too, the consequence is boiling point


suppression. Due to the level of liquid, the water pressure in the bottom pipes of the bundle is much higher than the 0.556bar, with the result that the water here does not evaporate. Te highly viscous medium now runs through the pipes and would lead to a very low heat transfer coefficient because of the low Reynolds number. Te use of turbulence


Fig. 4. The falling film solution is a perfect example of simplicity and robustness.


Johan van der Kamp is with Bronswerk Heat Transfer. www.bronswerk.com


www.engineerlive.com 43


and robustness. Te decision to use steam generators based on the falling film principle results in equipment with the highest possible steam pressure. Tis is the best possible economic balance between CAPEX and OPEX. l


For more information ✔ at www.engineerlive.com/iog


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84